My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV96873
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV96873
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:25 AM
Creation date
11/22/2007 12:04:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/13/1993
Doc Name
GOLDEN EAGLE MINE PN C-81-013 BASIN RESOURCES INC TR-23 ADEQUACY REVIEW
From
DMG
To
BASIN RESOURCES INC
Type & Sequence
TR23
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Sl., Room 215 <br />Dem~er, CO BO?ol <br />Phone. Doll 866 3567 <br />FAX:(303)A32-8106 <br />August 13, 1993 <br />Mr. Ron Thompson <br />Senior Mine Engineer <br />Basin Resources, Inc. <br />14300 Highway 12 <br />rJeston, CO 81091 <br />RE: Golden Eagle Mine, Permit No. C-81-013, Basin Resources, Inc., TR-23, <br />Adequacy Review <br />Dear Mr. Thompson: <br />In addition to the adequacy questions presented in the Division's letter of <br />June 18, 1993, following are additional questions or comments: <br />pF COQ <br />„~`"/ 9 <br />~ ~ O <br />~.~ R <br />re+r,®' . <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long <br />Dnivon Direc mr <br />1. The Sedcad runs use a 10 year - 24 hour event of 2.7 inches of <br />precipitation: The NOAA atlas shows that 2.9 inches of <br />precipitation is more appropriate. Please rerun the Sedcad runs <br />using 2.9 inches of precipitation for the 10 year - 24 hour event. <br />2. If the operator chooses to remove the ditches and sump at the third <br />north intake shaft, then the topsoil stockpile near the intake <br />shaft will need demonstrations, since the topsoil pile would not <br />report to a sediment pond. <br />3. Does the SAE demonstration for the third north intake shaft area <br />include the gravel drop area as well? How will the gravel drop <br />facility function while still maintaining the area as an SAE? <br />4. A CP value of .035 was used for the third north intake shaft area <br />and for the NW-1 exhaust shaft area. According to the Sedcad <br />manual, Table 5.5c, CP Factors for Permanent Pasture, Rangeland, <br />Idle Land and Grazed Woodland, this CP value corresponds to a 65 <br />percent vegetative cover and litter that contacts the ground, with <br />no appreciable canopy and a cover of grass. My recollection of <br />these 2 shaft areas makes me believe that this CP value is too low. <br />At the NW-1 exhaust shaft area, my recollection is that about half <br />of the area is bare soil, CP=1, and that about one-fifth of the <br />vegetated area is a little sparse. At the third north intake, most <br />of the vegetated areas were sparsely covered. <br />Please justify the CP value used. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.