Laserfiche WebLink
Therefore, IT IS RECOMMENDED as follows: <br />That Plaintiff BTU Empire Corporation's (°PlaintifP) Motion for Leave to <br />File Amended Complaint [#12], filed November 24, 2004, BE GRANTED; <br />2 That Lisa Barker, Glen E. Stinson, the State of Colorado, the Colorado <br />Department of Natural Resources, its constituent Division of Parks and <br />Outdoor Recreation, and the Board of Parks and Outdoor Recreation, BE <br />ADDED as defendants to this action; <br />3 That the case caption BE AMENDED accordingly, <br />4 That Glen Stinson's Motion to Intervene Pursuant to Feo. R. CN. P. 24(a) <br />[#24], filed on January 20, 2005, BE DENIED AS MOOT; <br />5. That Plaintiffs Motion to Remand j#10], filed October 27, 2004, BE <br />DENIED AS MOOT; and <br />6. That this case BE REMANDED to the State District Court in Moffat <br />County, Colorado <br />III. Advisement to the Parties. <br />Within ten days after service of a copy of the Recommendation, any party may <br />serve and file written objections to the magistrate judge's proposed findings and <br />recommendations with the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of <br />Colorado. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); FEU. R. Cnr. P. 72(b); !n re Griego, 64 F.3d 580, <br />583 (10'" Cir. 1995). <br />The district judge shall make a de novo determination of those speck portions <br />of the proposed findings or recommendations to which specific objection is made. 28 <br />9 <br />