Laserfiche WebLink
~~.-`• ~ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII • <br />999 <br /> STATF, OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Depanmenl of Nmural Resources <br />I J 1 J $I`elman 51., Room 215 DIVISION O F <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />' MINERAL 5 <br />Phnnr: 17081 8fi5-}SG, & <br />FAY: UUA 1112-8106 <br />January l4, 2000 G E O L O G Y <br /> RECLAMATION <br /> MI NING•SAFETY <br />Mr. Rick Mills <br />Twentymile Coal Company Bill Owens <br />29515 Routt County Road No. 27 eOVe`n°` <br />Oak Creek <br />CO 80467 Greg E Walther <br />, Execmrve D~reaor <br /> Michael B. Long <br />Re: Foidel Creek Mine, C-82-056, Permit Renewal No. 3, Adequacy Response Review Di.,,~°n D~recmr <br />Dear Mr. Mills: <br />The Division has reviewed Twentymile Coal Company's responses to the Division's adequacy letters <br />dated September 10, 1999, and October 6, 1999. Twentymile Coal Company's responses were received <br />November 16, 1999, November 30, 1999, and December 20, 1999. The Division sent Twentymile Coal <br />Company another letter on December 21, 1999 identifying several items that still needed response, or <br />additional items of concern. Twentymile Coal Company's letter, dated December 15, 1999 (received <br />December 20, 1999), states that additional information would be addressed by a consultant (Montgomery <br />Watson) contracted by Twentymile Coal Company. The Division received portions identified as <br />contracted to the consultant on January ] 0, 2000. <br />The proposed decision date had been December 31, 1999. Since several adequacy items remain <br />outstanding, Twentymile Coal Company faxed a request for extension to the Division on December 30, <br />1999. This request asks for extension of the Division's proposed decision date until January 31, 2000. <br />The Division will extend the decision date to January 31, 2000. <br />This letter serves to state which adequacy items have been resolved and what items remain outstanding. <br />The Division will continue to use the numbering from the March 2, 1998 adequacy letter. Several <br />adequacy items were inadvertently renumbered in the September 10, 1999 adequacy letter. In these <br />instances, both the original and renumbered items aze cross referenced. <br />1. Revised page 3 of the permit renewal application was not submitted with updated pemut acreage <br />intormation. This page does not reflect the current permitted acreage. Please provide a revised <br />page 3 with the corrected permitted acreage. <br />3.a) This item was resolved by corrections to pages 2.04-7 and 2.04-7.1. <br />b) This item was resolved by corrections to pages 2.04-7 and 2.04-7. l . <br />5. Twentymile Coal Company revised page 2.04-2~ as requested. This item is resolved. <br />6. Twentymile Coal Company revised page 2.04-41 as requested. This item is resolved <br />7.6) Twentymile Coal Company revised page 2.05-2 and 2.05-2.1 to adequately address this item. <br /> <br />