My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV96317
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV96317
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:02 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:58:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1984168
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/23/1985
Doc Name
AN APPLICATION FOR A PERMIT TO CONDUCT S&G MINING & RECLAMATION ACTIVITIES IN MOFFAT CNTY COLO
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ <`t <br />MINED LAND WILDLIFE STATEMENT/EVALUATION (Revised <br /> <br />For Limited Impact and Select Regular Mine Applications <br />The following information pertaining to wildlife is provided for use by Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board in their consideration of a mining permit for: <br />Mining, Inc./sand and <br />ame Type an Locati~ <br />•avel/T6N, R91W, SW;, Sec. 16 <br />o ine Lega <br />Wildlife Species list: <br />Elk, mule deer, bald eagle, Canada goose, greater <br />various species of raptors, mammals, and songbirds. <br />Endangered/critical s ep ties/impacted: <br />Bald eagle, greater sandhill crane/elk, mule deer. <br />Critical habitats/vegetative communities impacted: <br />sandhill .crane, sage grouse, <br />Bald eagle nest close by, sandhill crane staging and nesting in area, elk and <br />mule deer severe winter range/riparian and sagebrush. <br />• Assessment of impact: <br />Minimal as long as project stays away from river. <br />Mine Reclamation recommendations (include key species/habitats for which restoration <br />is designed). <br />1) Stay behind (east of) the line of cottonwood trees along the western edge of <br />the project area as shown on plan. Pit dewatering operations could kill existing <br />cottonwoods. Proponeni,<, should be responsible for maintaining cottonwood trees <br />on a one-for-one basis. These cottonwood provide many important wildlife habitats. <br />2) Create irregularities along the pit shoreline including the previously permitted <br />pit at the same project area. Irregularities include points, coves, peninsulas, <br />etc. and will increase the total length of shoreline in the pit. The greater <br />the length of shoreline the better it will be for fish and wildlife. <br />3) Create irregularities on the pit bottom below the waterline. This includes <br />shoals, shallower slopes along the pit banks, rock piles, berms of gravel and <br />overburden, broken concrete, old tires, weighted trees, etc. These irregu- <br />larities will increase the extent of aquatic substrate and benefit aquatic <br />fauna and flora. Shoals would provide substrate for emergent aquatic veg- <br />etation and provide spawning habitat for warmwater sportfish. <br />Prepared by: Tom Lines, Chuck Woodward, Bill Date: Continued: <br />E blad <br />Submitted by: Bill Elmblad ~~~ ~.~Date: May 15, 1985 <br />This statement is void if not processed within one year. <br />This analysis does not constitute approval of application. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.