My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV96248
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV96248
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:21:00 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:57:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977210
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/5/1989
Doc Name
ADEQUACY ITEMS-CASTLE CONCRETE CO-SNYDER QUARRY AMENDMENT-MLRD PNM-77-210 AM-03
From
MLRD
To
MARK A HEIFNER
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• iiiiii-iiiii-iiiii~ <br />STATE OF COLOIZAUU <br />Roy Romer, Govei <br />DEPARTMENT OFNATURALRESOURCES <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />FRED R. BANTA, Dlreetor <br />June 5, 1989 <br />Mr. tdark A. Heifner <br />37 E. Colorado Avenue <br />Denver, Colorado 80210 <br />RE: Adequacy Items <br />Castle Concrete Company <br />Snyder Quarry Amendment <br />MLRD Permit No. M-77-210, AM-03 <br />Dear Mr. Heifner: <br />Please find enclosed our review of your responses to our adequacy letter of <br />~1ay 15, 1989. You will note that there are still a few items unresolved. <br />Mining Plan <br />Item 1: You state that "this amendment simply inserts an additional phase <br />into the overall phasing of the operation." However, from recent telephone <br />conversations with you, there is apparently a portion of the acreage approved <br />for non-excavation in the 1984 amendment that will be excavated per this 1989 <br />amendment. Please identify this acreage on your revised mining plan and <br />reclamation plan maps. Please state the amount of acres that are being <br />proposed for conversion from non-excavation to excavation use. <br />Item 2: No additional response is necessary. Thank you. <br />Item 3: No additional response is necessary. Thank you. <br />Item 4: No additional response is necessary. Thank you. <br />Item 5: You state: "...if the total depth of mining is greater than the <br />final wall height, several benches must be worked at a time in order to <br />satisfy safety requirements." What is this maximum wall height that once <br />exceeded will necessitate additional benches? <br />Item 6: In your response, you state "under the revised plan, where the <br />horseshoe-shaped 2.4 acres have been removed..., it is unlikely that a north <br />crossing would ever be needed; however, we wish to keep that in the plan <br />because it is possible that equipment access to the north end of the mining <br />area might still be needed...." How much of this newly-removed acreage will <br />remain completely undisturbed as part of the activity at the mine? Even <br />though it will not be excavated, will any of this revised area be used as <br />access roads, drilling pads, refuse areas, etc.? <br />215 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203.2273 Tel. (303) 866.3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.