Laserfiche WebLink
Wetland Hydrology owners considered before draining wedands, flood <br /> The Minois study found that wetlands can affect flood protection and drainage provided by federal proj- <br /> ects had the largest impact.This incentive to farm <br /> heights in two ways: by intercepting and storing the floodplain was not taken into consideration in <br /> water and by slowing the rate at wfuch water reaches making the decision to build a flood control project " <br /> the stream. Although the hydrologic response may <br /> vary, there is one basic truth: streams adjacent to a <br /> wedand will have very different flow characteristics Nonstructural Alternatives <br /> from streams denuded of riparian vegetation.° Like Soldiers Grove, several communities in differ- <br /> Other researchers have found that peak flows ent parts of die country have used nonstructural al- <br /> increase substantially after adjacent wetlands are ternatives to control flooding.These projects gener- <br /> drained. One researcher studying the effect of wet- ally involve returning the floodplain to its natural <br /> lands losses on streamflows in Wisconsin found that state, and in some cases restoring the associated wet- <br /> flood peaks might be as much as 80 percent lower in lands. A project similar to Soldiers Grove used the <br /> basins with significant lake and wetland area.' Oth- natural flood control functions of 8,500 acres of wet- <br /> ers have come to similar conclusions, finding that lands along the upper Charles River in Massachu- <br /> the hydrologic detention function of wedands re- setts.The cost of buying full tide or easements to <br /> duces the size of flood pulses.8 the wedands was S10 million, far less than the $100 <br /> Although wetlands types ear3,, the most com- million needed to build upstream clams and levees. <br /> mon wetlands in the Midwest are depressions that The wetlands store more than 50,000 acre-feet of <br /> temporarily detain water, known as shallow basins water, as much as a medium-sized reser oir. A U.S. <br /> or prairie potholes. Losing these wedands has greadv Army Corps final report on the project found that <br /> increased the rate at which water moves off the land- "nature has already provided the least-cost solution <br /> scape and into the floodplain.' to future flooding in the form of extensive wetlands <br /> that moderate extreme highs and lows in stream <br /> The Effect of Levees flow. Rather than attempt to improve on this natu- <br /> ral protection mechanism, it is both prudent and <br /> By confining the water to the channel and prevent- economical to leave the hydrologic regime estab- <br /> ing it from spreading over the floodplain, levees in- lished over the millennia undisturbed."" <br /> crease flood heights.1°A study of the 1973 flood on The ciw of Littleton, Colorado, established a <br /> the Mississippi attributed higher flood stages to a 625-acre floodplain park and natural area along 2.5 <br /> combination of levees and navigation projects. Com- miles of the South Plate River, where water can be <br /> paring the 1973 flood with the 1908 flood, the study absorbed and temporarily stored during big floods. <br /> found that while the two floods had nearly the same Officials in Boulder, Colorado, created a five-mile <br /> volume of water, the 1973 flood crest was eight feet recreational greemvav and bike path along Boulder <br /> higher." A study by the U.S. Army Corps indicates Creek. In Boulder, wedands have been created or <br /> that the record 1844 flood would now crest about restored to temporarily absorb and snore stormwater. <br /> ten feet higher at Boonville, Missouri, and 12 feet Meanwhile, the trout'fishery has been restored and <br /> higher at Hermann, Dlissoun. the park has become a central meeting point for the <br /> Before channelization, the Mississippi eroded its community. In a siniihr project, the city of Tulsa, <br /> bottom and banks during flood peaks, making room Oklahoma, after a series of floods,developed a green- <br /> for floodwaters by increasing the storage capacity,of way plan for Mingo Creek that links parks and trails <br /> the channel and by using the floodplain as a natural with multipurpose flood control structures. <br /> reservoir." By the time the Great Flood of 1993 ar- <br /> rived, the river channel had lost about one-third of The Future of Flood Control <br /> its volume to channelization, sedimentation, and <br /> other effects of development, and the floodplain The current groundswell of support for relocation <br /> had been replaced by farms and cut off from the and wedands restoration has not gone unnoticed. In <br /> river by a canyon of sand and gravel. August, the Clinton Administration instructed the <br /> In addition to the damage associated with the Corps and other relevant federal agencies to consider <br /> levees themselves, federal flood control projects "nonstructural alternatives and design modifications <br /> have encouraged landowners to drain wetlands. that could provide greater local benefits of flood <br /> Two economists have found that nearly one-third control, reduction of future potential flood damages <br /> of the wedands lost in the Mississippi Valley were to the applicant and adjacent upstream and down- <br /> lost because of private decisions induced by federal stream localities, lower long-term costs to the fed- <br /> flood control projects. Construction of flood con- eral government, and natural resource protection."" <br /> trol and drainage projects led to a higher rate of The administration has created several task <br /> wedands conversion than would have occurred, as forces, including one specifically focused on the I <br /> these projects allowed farming in areas not pre- levee rebuilding issue. However, the guidance the <br /> viously suitable. In fact, of all the factors that land- administration has issued does not go far enough to <br /> 26 Urban Land • il-larrb 1994 <br />