My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV96047
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV96047
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:52 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:55:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1973021
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/25/1998
Doc Name
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS REGULAR 112 OPERATION RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM
Type & Sequence
AM5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />S~ XII. GEOTECHNICAL STABILITY EXHIBIT <br />ll3.01 Requirements <br />1.2u1e 6, Section 6.5 requires an applicant to provide a geotechnical evaluation of geologic hazards that might <br />affect proposed improvements, slopes, embankments, highwalls or waste piles within the proposed affected <br />;area, [t also requires that where blasting is part of the proposed mining plan, off-site areas will not be <br />adversely affected by blasting. <br />13.02 Highwall Slopes <br />Amendment No. 3 for the Morrison Quarry was submitted in [993 largely in response to localized slope <br />instability and bench failure occurrences on the east wall of the Central Quarry area. These problems were <br />shown to be the result of constructing relatively steep slopes then loading them with backfill during <br />reclamation in an area where a dominant, moderately shallow dipping, daylightingjoint set occurs with respect <br />to the slope orientation. Appendix A of Amendment No. 3 provides a detailed slope stability study and <br />remediation plan for the slope failure azea. <br />Results of this study were extended in Exhibit D -Mining Plan of Amendment No. 3 to establish an <br />"observational approach" to slope stability throughout the quarry whereby conservatively shallow slopes are <br />excavated based on slope stability modeling results, additional geotechnical evaluations made, and steeper <br />slopes constructed if updated stability modelingjustifies them. This approach is aUeady in place for the quarry <br />and is proposed to remain the geotechnical stability process for future mined areas. Geotechnical stability <br />updates were required by DMG after approval of Amendment No. 3 to be included in the facility Annual <br />Reports. An updated summary of new geologic core hole data, ground water levels, geologic mapping and <br />computer simulations of slope stability have been part of the Annual Report since 1994 and at the end of each <br />subsequent operation year. <br />Discussions of the stability of slopes, highwalls and benches are also included in Exhibit D -Mining Plan of <br />this Amendment No. 4. Together, the special slope failure study for the east slope of the Central Quarry, the <br />mining plans of this and the previous amendment, and the planned Annual Report geotechnical updates satisfy <br />the geotechnical stability intent of Rule 6, Section 6.5. <br />13.03 Blasting <br />Blasting has been a routine and ongoing part of operations at the quarry for over twenty years. Site personnel <br />are trained and experienced in production blasting. Vibration monitoring is routinely performed and blast and <br />G:VROlECf5~10:OQ~LOTTE%PAMFNDOS.TXT XII - I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.