My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV95962
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV95962
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:49 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:53:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/25/1994
Doc Name
REVIEW OF PR 2 ADEQUACY RESPONSE 2 EAGLE 5 AND 9 MINES PN C-81-044
From
DMG
To
JANET BINNS
Type & Sequence
RN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />• • iii iiiiuiiiiiu iii <br />STATE OF COLOi~uU <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 <br />FAX:13031832-8106 <br />To: Janet Binns ~Q~ <br />From: Barbara Pavlik 1~' <br />Date: January 25, 1994 <br />Re: Review of Permit Renewal No. 2 Adequacy Response No. 2 <br />Eagle #5 and #6 Mines (C-81-044) <br />p° ep~o <br />ti 9 <br />+e' O <br />~B ]6 <br />Roy ROmer <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Director <br />I have reviewed the adequacy responses that Cyprus Empire <br />Corporationl(CEC) submitted during our meeting on January 21, 1994. <br />The responses dealt specifically with ground water issues raised in <br />the adequacy review. The following discussion references the item <br />numbers referenced in CEC's response. <br />II B. Annual Hydrology Review <br />The response to this concern is adequate and will be relevant only <br />until the Okie Plaza is mined through in 1994. <br />Renewal Application Review <br />III B. <br />The response to this concern is adequate. <br />11. <br />The fourth paragraph on page 2.04.7-2 of the PAP needs to be <br />clarified so that the reader understands that the source of the <br />drainage to the mine workings is only the Middle Sandstone. The <br />statement that currently appears in the PAP, "This decline is <br />probably related to drainage of the sandstones to the No. 5 mine <br />workings", which immediately follows a statement that "Ground water <br />levels have declined in both the Middle and Trout Creek <br />Sandstones"; implies that the drainage to the mine workings is from <br />both of the sandstone units. <br />14. <br />The response to this concern is adequate. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.