Laserfiche WebLink
<br />' Water levels in the backfilled pit are measured at Wells BF-1 and BF-2, installed to monitor <br />the recovery of the water table within the backfilled pit. The wells were drilled in mid- <br />' December of 1997 and have never shown significant fluctuation. The water table appears to <br />have stabilized much sooner than anticipated. Several things may have contributed to this, <br />' including higher than normal precipitation. Several of the studies proposed later in this <br />document will allow BMRI to gain a better understanding of the hydrologic regime, including <br />the magnitude and direction of groundwater flow through the backfill material. <br />In addition to stabilizing sooner than expected, the groundwater elevations are much higher <br />' than anticipated. The water levels in BF-1 are approximately 12 feet below the top of the <br />backfill, while the levels in BF-2 are approximately lb feet below the top of the backfill. The <br />water table may fluctuate within a 12-inch zone, but limited data is available and the si[e has <br />been experiencing higher than normal precipitation, so long-term fluctuations may differ. <br />' These higher than anticipated water elevations have resulted in the potential fpr groundwater <br />from the pit to migrate to the steep banks of the Rito Seco and appear as surface seeps on the <br />' banks. <br />' 3.2 GROUND WATER QUALITY <br />TR-15 established several groundwater monitoring wells downgradient of the backfilled West <br />Pit [o monitor groundwater quality. These wells included SF-1, DW-2, and M-11, M-10, 87- <br />24. Table 1 of Appendix A shows the groundwater monitoring wells and the units of <br />completion. Wells DW-2, M-10, and 87-24 are monitored for informational purposes only. <br />Wells SF-1 and M-11 were established as compliance wells. Baseline data wer¢ evaluated for <br />' these wells. Any data outliers were eliminated, using the Dixon method, and the compliance <br />limit was set at the drinking water standard or the highest value recorded in the well, <br />' whichever was higher. Each well has separate compliance limits which can be found in TR- <br />15. <br />' In the fall of 1995, iron levels in M-11 began to rise and eventually exceeded the compliance <br />limit. M-11 is a shallow well and it was determined that the iron was being produced by iron <br />' bacteria. This is a common phenomena in the San Luis valley in shallow wells. BMRI <br />decided to abandon M-11 instead of trying to kill the bacteria. A replacement well, M-11R, <br />' was drilled in the spring of 1996. This well was subject to at least a year of baseline <br />12 <br /> <br />