My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV95044
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV95044
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:13 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:45:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/14/2002
Doc Name
Proposed Decision Letter & Form, (Enclosure-Review Check List ARR & AHR)
From
DMG
To
Trapper Mining Inc
Type & Sequence
TR90
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review Checklist for Annual Reclamation Report <br />Mine: Trapper Mine Date of review: 6/11/02 <br />Permit No.: C-81-010 DMG reviewer: Janet Binns <br />Report Year: 2001 <br />Submitted by: Trapper Mining Inc. (as TR-90) <br />Date received <br />by Division: 3/18/02 <br /> Require <br /> Require- -ment <br />Requirement ment complie <br />d with ? Comment <br /> citation (yes / <br /> no <br />A. Filing CDMG <br />frequency of regulation yes <br />reclamation 2 04.13 <br />re ort <br />B, Timely filing CDMG <br />of regulation es Provided to inspector 3/15/02 in field. Permit commitment due <br />reclamation 2.04.13 y date: <br />re ort <br />C. General CDMG <br />content of regulation yes <br />reclamation 2,04.13 <br />re ort <br />D. Annual filing Section <br />of 3.5.3 of <br />reclamation Trapper's yeS <br />ma ermit <br />E. Topographic The areas where final grading occurred in 2001 were compared <br /> to the approved post mining topography by overlaying the 2001 <br />contours on <br />reclamation CDMG reclamation map on Map M-12. Regraded topography was also <br />map regulation eS compared [opre-mining topography, Map 3. Slight variances <br />approximate 4.14.1(2)(a) y between the proposed post-mining contours and the 2001 ARR <br />[he original regraded contours exist. These variances are appropriate and <br /> acceptable in accordance with Rule 4.14.1(2)(a). Areas verified <br />contours included F-AB-O1 39.64 acres) and A-B-O1 58.83 acres . <br />F. Annual filing Section In accordance with TR-89, approved December 2001, the <br />of spoil 2.7.2 of <br />' <br />Yes <br />requirement to sample regraded spoil was discontinued in the <br />sampling Trapper <br />s Ashmore and Flintlock pi[s.(permit pg. 2-361b) <br />re ort ennit <br />G. Submittal of ~ The proposed seed mixes found in Tables 7-1, 7-2, 7-3 and 7-4 <br />proposed Section were previously approved in TR-74. TMI proposes an seed mix <br />revegetation 3.6.3.5 of to use for interseeding to improve shrub establishment in <br />seed mix for Trapper's Yes previously seeded areas, Table 7-5. This proposed seed mix <br /> consists of native non-aggressive fortis and native shrubs. The <br />upcoming permit proposed seed mix favors establishment of sagebrush species. <br />year The Division finds this ro osed seed mix acce table. <br />Page 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.