My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV94968
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV94968
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:11 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:44:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981021
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/30/1986
Doc Name
BOURG STRIP MIDTERM REVIEW FN C-81-021
From
MLRD
To
WALDEN COAL CO
Type & Sequence
MT1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />David M. Getches, Executive Director <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAVID C. SNELTON, Olrector <br />Riohartl D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />January 30, 1986 <br />Ms. Kay James <br />Walden Coal Company <br />P. 0. Box 229 <br />Boulder, Colorado 80306 <br />Re: Bourg Strip Mid-Term Review - File No. C-81-021 <br />Dear Ms. James: <br />The Division has reviewed the Walden Coal Company Mid-Term Review response, <br />and requests that the following revision be incorporated into the Bourg Strip <br />permit through the Mid-Term Technical Revision: <br />1) Walden Coal Company should submit to the Division an Annual <br />Hydrologic Report (AHR) no later then January 15 of each year. Each AHR <br />should contain all hydrologic data collected during the previous water year <br />(October 1 thru September 30). Each AHR should also contain a narrative <br />describing the effects, if any, of mining to the hydrologic system (ground - <br />and surface - waters), and how these effects differed from those projected in <br />the PHC and CHIS sections of the permit application and findings documents. <br />The dewatering of wells and their associated aquifers, pit inflows, and actual <br />or projected water quality/quantity trends should be discussed. This annual <br />report will eliminate the need for periodic submittals other than NPDES, which <br />are required quarterly. <br />2) The Division has reevaluated the Bourg Strip bonding costs. This <br />reevaluation, which is enclosed, reflects current costs to reclaim the <br />Bourg Strip given a worst case scenario. <br />The Division realizes that the bonding amount has changed considerably since <br />the May 9, 1985 Mid-Term review comments. Using current Division bond <br />calculation policy, it is felt that Walden Coal Company has not utilized the <br />appropriate job condition correction factors for estimating dozer production. <br />Specifically, the "material" correction factor of 1.2 pertaining to loose <br />stockpile material is not appropriate given that some compaction of the <br />overburden has occurred by virtue of the method of placement (scrapers) in the <br />stockpile and some settling of the material which has no doubt occurred since <br />placement of the material. Additionally, Walden Coal's use of both <br />"side-by-side" and "slot dozing" correction factors is inappropriate as these <br />factors refer to alternate methods of dozing utilizing a single dozer (slot <br />dozing) or dozer pairs (side-by-side dozing). One or the other dozing method <br />correction factors can be utilized, but not both. With these factors <br />corrected, net hourly production becomes 494.8 LCY/h r. This increases total <br />backfilling costs to E799,417.78. <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866-3567 <br />i III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.