My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV94795
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV94795
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:20:05 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:43:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/8/1995
Doc Name
WEST ELK MINE PN C-80-007 MINOR REVISION 150 LONE PINE GULCH FAN FACILITIES SAE DEMONSTRATION AS BUI
From
MTN COAL CO
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
MR150
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mountain Coal Company <br />West Elk Mlne <br />Past Oflke Baa 591 <br />Somerset, Cokxado 87434 <br />Telephone 3 03 92450 7 5 <br />Fau 303929-5595 <br />June 02, 1995 <br />Ms. Christine E. Johnston <br />° D <br />I>r ~b - 9 S <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Office of Mined Land Reclamation <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />RECEIVFI_t <br />JUN 0 8 1995 <br />Division of Minerals a Geology <br />Re: West Elk Mine, Permit No. C-80-007, Minor Revision No. 150, Lone Pine Gulch Fan <br />Facilities SAE Demonstration As-Built, Response to Concerns <br />Dear Christine: <br />Mountain Coal Company (MCC) provides the following response to the Division's concerns per <br />your letters of May 10, 1995, and May 15, 1995, regarding revised SAE demonstration for the <br />Lone Pine Gulch facilities (MR 150). <br />May 10 Letter <br />1.-4. No response required. <br />5. Map 54A will be revised and submitted with the approval of the revised SAE and <br />drainage designs for the Lone Pine Gulch facilities. <br />6. A revised page 2 of 13 was forwarded to you by Greystone which describes the <br />configuration of the ditches at the topsoil stockpile, rather than calling them "feathered" <br />May 15 Letter <br />MCC agrees with the Division that the SedCAD demonstration is an effective modeling <br />tool, and that field-proven sediment control devices, such as silt fence, straw bale filters, <br />etc., that are not accounted for in the model, should be utilized. As stated above, on <br />revised page 2 of 13, "feathered" ditches are still a part of the demonstration, and on page <br />3 of 13, the flow distribution straw bales and filter fencing are to be utilized at the berm <br />breaks (B-1 & B-2) and culvert outfalls (C-3 & C-4) and at the toes ofthe staging area fill <br />and topsoil pile, respectively. The only silt fence that has been removed from the <br />demonstration are the mid-slope and toe silt fences on the fan bench cut, as these <br />structures simply cannot be installed and maintained on this steep rock-filled area. The <br />fences were in fact installed at this location, as you may recall, but were destroyed or <br />buried by rock debris. MCC has installed additional, "back up" to each of the structures <br />IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />sss <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.