My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-01-31_REVISION - M1977208
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977208
>
2005-01-31_REVISION - M1977208
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/16/2021 6:21:22 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:41:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977208
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/31/2005
Doc Name
Response to Adequacy Ltrs.
From
CEMEX Inc
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Response to Adequacy Letters (dated November 22 and December 17, 2004), CEMEX, Inc., Lyons Quarry, Permit <br />No. M-1977-208, TR-04 and TR-O5. <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />downward seepage of ponded water in C-Pit as vertical flow in the Dakota is upwazds. If <br />continuous vertical fractures, which have not been observed, existed between C-Pi[ and the <br />Dakota, groundwater in the Dakota would flow upwazds along these fractures and discharge to <br />C-Pit as artesian flow. <br />Although is not reasonable to assume that C-Pit seepage could flow to the Dakota aquifer, <br />Cemex modeled a hypothetical release of C-Pit water on Dakota aquifer water quality. Model <br />details and results were submitted with TR-04 as the report Evaluation of the Potential Impact of <br />Ponded C-Pit Water on Groundwater Quality in the Dakota Sandstone. In modeling the <br />potential water quality impact, CEMEX conservatively assumed [hat C-Pit seepage was released <br />directly to the Dakota, ignoring transport through the bedrock units between C-Pit and the <br />Dakota which could take several hundred yeazs at the estimated groundwater flow rate in the <br />shales of 1 foot per year. <br />Seepage was released at the point labeled "modeled contaminant source ielease at 0 years" on <br />Attachment 1. The annual volume of seepage released to the Dakota was conservatively <br />assumed to be about 7% of the total water volume in C-Pit (about 2.5 million gallons). Seepage <br />was released to the Dakota for a period of 3 years, a total of about 7.5 million gallons. The <br />concentrations of constituents released to the Dakota were the maximum constituent <br />concentrations measured in C-Pit prior to November 2004. Constituent transport was also <br />conservative as constituent sorption or decay was not allowed. The constituents were allowed to <br />travel at the same rate as groundwater. <br />The water quality impacts were modeled at a hypothetical receptor well in the Dakota located <br />about 3,000 feet downgradient from the injection point directly in the Dakota as shown in <br />Attachment 1. Model results predicted that a constituent plume would travel from the source <br />release point to the hypothetical well in the Dakota with the maximum constituent concentration <br />predicted to arrive at the well in about 30 years. Even considering the conservative assumotions <br />used in the model, none of the constituents modeled (oH, chloride, sulfate. TDS, selenium or <br />thallium) exceeded the Colorado eroundwater protection standards at the hypothetical receptor <br />well. <br />The impact of the conservative model design on the predicted results was summarized indicating <br />that: <br />• The estimated annual seepage volume of 7% from C-Pit is likely overestimated, thus the <br />constituent mass released directly to the Dakota was also likely overestimated. <br />• If the constituent mass released is overestimated, the constituent concentrations at the <br />hypothetical receptor well may be significantly less than predicted. <br />• Constituent transport across the intervening low permeability, heterogeneous strata <br />between C-Pit and Dakota would naturally attenuate seepage constituent concentrations <br />via dispersion, sorption, or geochemical reaction prior to their arrival in the Dakota. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.