My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV94634
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV94634
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:19:59 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:41:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984065
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/2/1990
Doc Name
COAL RIDGE 1 MINE C-84-065 PR 1
From
MLRD
To
NEW CASTLE ENERGY CORP
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,. <br />,,. <br />iii ~ftitf~i~~~~~~~~~ ~, <br />STATE ur~ COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />13t3 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 60203 <br />303 666-3567 <br />FAx: 303 632-8706 <br />October 2, 1990 <br />Mr. Peter Matthies <br />New Castle Energy Corporation <br />7476 E. Arkansas Avenue, Unit 104 <br />Denver, CO 80231 <br />RE: Coal Ridge No, l Mine {C-84-065) -Permit Revision 1 <br />Dear Mr. Matthies: <br />OF CpfO <br />,~ %~Ig <br />•'n ~ ~`~ <br />Y r87fi ~' <br />Roy Romer, <br />Gavemor <br />Fretl R. Banta. <br />Drv~Swn D~reotOr <br />Following discussions with Dan Mathews and Fred Banta, the following issues <br />for the Permit Revision are still outstanding, <br />The proposed loadout will need to be handled as a separate permit revision, in <br />order to allow a separate publication and public comment period, pursuant to <br />rule 2.08.4(3) and Section 115 (1)(c) of the Act. This is necessitated by the <br />fact that proper public notice of the proposed location of the facility has <br />not been provided. <br />Since MSHA has indicated that they do not consider the proposed underground <br />waste disposal plan to be approvable, we cannot recommend approval of the plan <br />in our proposed decision. A possible alternative would be to'modify the <br />temporary waste disposal plan to indicate that the disposal would be <br />constructed as a permanent facility. The capacity of the pile would have to <br />be demonstrated to be adequate for the proposed permit term. A11 requirements <br />of Rules 2.05.3(8) and 4.10 apply, including: <br />- diversions must be designed and constructed to convey the 100-year <br />runoff event from the pile itself and to convey upstream runoff away <br />from the pile; <br />- the pile must be constructed in compacted two-foot lifts and must be <br />inspected for stability each calendar quarter by a registered <br />Professional Engineer; <br />- NCEC must demonstrate that four feet of non-toxic cover is available <br />for reclamation of the pile, and final reclamation of the pile must be <br />fully addressed and accounted for in the reclamation cost estimate and <br />the reclamation bond. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.