My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV94389
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV94389
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:19:51 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:40:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/2/1992
Doc Name
RENEWAL ADEQUACY REVIEW 2 WEST ELK MINE FILE NO C-80-007
From
DMG
To
MOUNTAIN COAL CO
Type & Sequence
RN2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r "•- <br />~ STATE O~CGIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~ <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 21 S <br />Denver, CO 8020) <br />Phone:13031866-1167 <br />FA%:(3031832-8106 <br />December 2, 1992 <br />Ms. Kathleen Welt <br />Environmental Supervisor <br />Mountain Coal Company <br />P.O. BoX 591 <br />Somerset, CO 81434 <br />OF.~Ct~ <br />`~~' M'~ <br />Y,~. <br />Rov Romer <br />Goverror <br />.~nichael B. Long <br />Division Ovecror <br />RE: Renewal Adequacy Review 2; Aest Elk Mine; File No. C-80-007 <br />Dear Ms. Welt; <br />The Division has reviewed the renewal adequacy responses dated <br />November 17, 1992, and received by the Division on November 30, <br />1992. The Division has determined that the information submitted <br />with your adequacy responses can be handled within the renewal <br />process because none of the material provided is a significant <br />change to West Elk's permit. However, the material that will be <br />provided by December 30, 1992, must be submitted in the form of a <br />revision. The following comments are arranged as in my previous <br />letter; however, I have omitted the questions where no further <br />action is required as stated in my letter dated June 1, 1992. <br />Pursuant to our conversation today, the Division should receive the <br />additional information discussed in this letter by December il, <br />1992. <br />PART I: April 9. 1991 Letter <br />V. Topsoil <br />1. A stipulation will be attached to the approval of West Elk's <br />permit to state that Maps 56 and 57, Topsoil Removal and <br />Topsoil Replacement Plans respectively, will be updated as <br />detailed in the Division's adequacy letter dated June 1, 1992 <br />and submitted by December 30, 1992. <br />A stipulation will be attached to the approval of West Elk's <br />permit to state that Map 53, Distribution of Surface <br />Facilities, and Table 47, Approximate Topsoil Volumes, will be <br />updated as detailed in the Division's adequacy letter dated <br />June 1, 1992 and submitted by December 30, 1992. <br />The sampling plan to determine compliance with topsoil depth <br />requirements is adequate. However, page 2.05-45 should be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.