Laserfiche WebLink
• <br /> <br />STATE • <br /> <br />OF iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Nawral Resource <br />131 7 Sherman St., Room 21 5 ` <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 80303 ~ <br />~ <br /> <br />Phune: 13071 866 3567 I <br />FAX: (303) 83?-81 U6 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br />DATE: August 8, 1994 RESOURCES <br />TO: Janet Binne /' RnE Rumen <br />~ <br />y <br />Govemo~ <br />( <br />J <br />FROH: Erica Crosby Aen s~i.,:~~ <br /> Eceaie re Duear r <br />RE: Hayden Gulch Loadout (C-92-081) <br /> <br />MR-O1 nl~~naeie Lnng <br /> Dir i.inn Director <br />Janet, we finally figured out to do about the AVS issue regarding the change in <br />operator for the Hayden Gul ch Loadout. The Seneca II and Seneca II-W remain as <br />CONDITIONAL ISSUE (as of Friday August 5, 1994 ). Go ahead and include a <br />stipulation to the permit... something like this; <br />"WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE ISSUANCE OF MR-O1, THE OPERATOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE <br />DIVISION VERIFICATION THAT AUDIT VIOLATION 930242003:940315, CMIS <br />VIOLATION C94-020-370-1:5420.00 AND KENTUCKY STATE VIOLATION <br />010677:885005:1:KY HAVE BEEN OR ARE BEING CORRECTED, OR THAT THE <br />VIOLATIONS ARE UNDER ADMINISTRATIVE OR JUDICIAL APPEAL. IF THE VIOLATIONS <br />ARE APPEALED, THE PERMITTEE SHALL SUBMIT TO THE DIVISION VERIFICATION OF <br />THE RESOLUTION OF THE APPEALS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. <br />I also have a few adequacy concerns that should be addressed to the operator <br />prior to the issuance of the minor revision: <br />Hayden Gulch Terminal failed to submit the ownership and control <br />information for Seneca Coal Company (now the operator). This information <br />is required under Rule 2.03.4(3). Please have the operator submit this <br />information. <br />The revised permit pages indicate the ownership relationship tied to <br />Hayden Gulch Terminal. Parent companies are also listed ae shareholders <br />and owners. The permittee should specify the percent of shares held by <br />the company and the percent ownership of one company to another. For <br />example, Peabody Holding Co. is listed ae 1008 share holder in AVS. This <br />1008 ownership should be listed in the permit pages. Another example is <br />that Hanson America Inc. and Hanson Holdings Netherlands HV are both <br />listed in the permit pages as owners of HM Holdings Inc. In AVS, Hanson <br />America is 848 owner while Hanson Holdings Netherlands BV owns only 148. <br />Percentages of ownership should be listed in the permit pages. <br />Robert E. Lee ie listed as a Vice Prea ident of Hanson America Inc. in the <br />permit pages (page 15) . AVS/OSM resigned Robert E. Lee from the AVS <br />system on 4/22/92. Please verify that Robert E. Lee remains a VP of <br />Hanson America Inc., and update the permit pages accordingly. <br />C:\AVS\940808 <br />