My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV94016
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV94016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:19:38 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:37:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981024
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/14/1993
Doc Name
MEMO CCMC PHASE II BOND RELEASE C-81-024
From
DMG
To
SHAWN SMITH
Type & Sequence
SL1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
w <br />approvable for CCMC. A plan for early spring grazing to make use <br />of the early green forage produced by the cool season species, and <br />periodic monitoring to determine if the relative contribution of <br />warm season grasses increases with time would be recommended as a <br />part of the Revision. The local Soil Conservation District would <br />be able to assist the operator in developing a grazing plan to most <br />effectively utilize the cool season pasture. <br />At CCMC, the species diversity standard specifies that two shrub <br />species provide at least 3% relative cover, in addition to a <br />density standard of 333 stems per acre. This is somewhat unusual <br />in that, due to the growth characteristics of woody plants, <br />specific relative cover requirements are generally not required for <br />shrubs. Prior to mining, the affected area was a grassland <br />dominated by blue grama, with widely scattered shrubs such as <br />cholla, rabbitbrush, and snakeweed. Unless woody plants are <br />necessary for specific wildlife requirements within the 60-70 acre <br />reclamation site, it is possible that the woody plant density <br />standard as well as the diversity standard for woody plants could <br />be reduced or eliminated. The Operator may wish to include such a <br />request, with appropriate justification, if they submit a revision <br />to the reclamation standards. Consultation with the Division of <br />Wildlife would be required to insure that the change would not <br />negatively impact wildlife populations in the area. <br />Please feel free to include this memo along with my memo of <br />September 7 with any review comments you forward to Kaiser. Let me <br />know if you want to discuss these issues further. <br />cc: Dan Hernandez, Larry Routten, Janet Binns, Tony Waldron, and <br />Steve Shuey <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.