My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV93955
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV93955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:19:35 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:37:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBIT VOLUME II
Type & Sequence
MR13
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
March 1998 Slrtmp Investigation and Mitigation Report ~ Page 11 <br />6.2.2 Subsurface Water <br />The piezometers described in Section 4.3, were installed to approximately 13'k co 18'k feet bgs, <br />well below the sliding surface of the slump, which is estimated to be shallower than 10 to 12 <br />feet bgs. The upper limit of the screen and sand pack sections were generally 5 to 8 feet bgs, <br />which is believed to be at or above the sliding surface. This configuration allows the <br />piezometers to register any water that has percolated along the sliding surface of the slump. <br />As listed in Table 1, water was observed in 5 of the piezometers on October 30, 1997, which <br />indicated the presence of water within and around the slump mass. Between the time of drilling <br />in September 1997 and [he field measurements in October 1997, the site received one to two <br />feet of snow. Subsequent to the snow fall, air temperatures increased, which melted much of <br />the snow. Therefore, the water observed in the piezometers probably reflected infiltration of <br />snow melt into the slump mass and not water table conditions. These data suggested that water <br />lubricated the slump plane as a result of infiltration downward into the general soils and [hen <br />migrated along the surface of the weathered bedrock. The water measured in the piezometers <br />was probably a result of the boreholes intercepting small flows as the water traveled along the <br />surface of the weathered bedrock, near the upper end of the screened intervals of the <br />piezometers. The water apparently entered the boreholes at such a slow rate that it either <br />accumulated very slowly in [he bottom of the piezometer or it seeped out almost as fast as it <br />entered. As such, there may have been an insufficient volume of percolating water to fill the <br />piezometers to the point of water entry into the piezometers. <br />6.2.3 Existing French Drain <br />The existing French drain was constructed to a depth of approximately 20 feet, with the lower <br />four feet backfilled with drain rock. The upper 16 feet of the trench was backfilled with native <br />materials, consisting of shale, sandstone, and siltstone, which are characterized as extremely <br />weathered and friable. The native backfill material could have zones with locally low <br />permeabilities. <br />Groundwater data from the upper and east end of the slump, as measured in piezometers PZ-1 <br />and PZ-2, indicated that the existing French drain could have intercepted some of the <br />subsurface seepage along that portion of the French drain. However, as indicated by the water <br />levels in PZ-5, the French drain may not have been effective along it's entire length, either due <br />to preferential water pathway directions or pathway elevations. The water pathways may have <br />had a slightly eastern orientation, similar to the slump path, and may have bypassed the <br />western end of the existing French drain. The presence of water within the slump mass, as <br />measured in piezometers PZ-3 and PZ-4, indicated that water was still accumulating at those <br />loco[ions either from subsurface seepage or from surface infiltration. In either case, this water <br />likely contributed to the driving force displacing the soil mass and reduced sliding resistance. <br />6.2.4 Slump Mitigation Issues <br />Based on review of available site information, the slump appears to be less than ten feet in <br />depth and movement is along an intermittently saturated zone within the shallow surficial soils <br />(reclaimed spoils} or shallow weathered siltstone. The driving forces are the weight of the soils <br />and water within the system, and the resisting forces are primarily friction and cohesion along <br />Montgomery Watson Americas "P.O. Box 7740/8 "Steamboat Springs, Colorado "80477 f97JJ 879-6160 <br />¢i \bA6lvmp MmRUmn\Slvmp Fryri <br />wvvn e. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.