REV93749 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Dan Matthews -2- 8106 TR-20. Please amend Appendix "G" ("Adjacent Property Owners") to include listing for Branch, Hedman, and Henry, with addresses. Listing for Ival & Ed Young, Inc., is apparently now out of date, and should be deleted. CAM: Please see updated Appendix G showing addresses for Branch, Hedman and Henry. Ival & Ed Young was replaced with #11 Enterprise information. 3. DRMS: On Figure 2.2-1 and all other maps that are at a scale of 1"=1000' or larger, the east end of the road corridor permit boundary in Section 29 has a notched appearance, which seems odd. Please explain and/or correct this apparent discrepancy as appropriate. CAM: The 'notched' appearance is due to the slight adjustment made to the permit boundary aspart of TR-20 to include right of entry for CAM's distribution line. As stated in adequacy response no. 1, dated February 14, 2006, item no. 2, `The permit boundary was adjusted slightly where CAM's distribution line ties into the mainline to be included in the permit boundary. The distribution line is granted entry via an existing BLM right of way.' The power line is shown on Figure 2.21a. In addition, please see the fetter from Steve Don verifying raptor protection is indeed complete as part of McClane Canyon TR-15; CAM letter dated June 9, 2006 Adequacy Response no. 9. Please find update TOC-12 for Munger canyon and insert the letter in Appendix L, 'Letters'. Please find updated List of Appendices for McClane Canyon and insert the letter in new Appendix Q, `Letters', 4. DRMS: On Figure 4.2-4, a remnant portion of the former permit boundary in Section 29 appears to have assumed the identity of the boundary between Qa and Kmgs geological units. The error needs to be corrected. CAM: Removed former permit boundary acting as boundary between Qa and Kmgs. 5. DRMS: Figure 4.3-2 was significantly and substantively revised, apparently from data obtained from exploration associated with the Red Cliff project. Please include narrative explanation of the map revisions. CAM: Figure 4.3-2 was placed on the base map, Figure 11 that was part of the McClane Canyon 2004 Stove Canyon Exploration Area. The Operator chose to replace the old Figure 4.3-2 with the new Figure 4.3-2 due to the fact that the data prepared as part of the Stove Canyon XPA is accurate and correct as of 2004. A revision block was added to Figure 4.3-2. 6. DRMS: On Figure 4.3-3, there are projected mine outlines apparently associated with the Red Cliff project. These projections could lead to confusion, particularly since they appear to extend into the Munger permit area. The projected mine outlines should be removed from the map.