My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV93228
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV93228
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:14:34 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:28:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1984065
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/8/1996
Doc Name
COAL RIDGE 1 MINE C-84-065 TR 13 PERMIT RENEWAL ISSUES
From
DMG
To
J E STOVER & ASSOCIATES
Type & Sequence
TR13
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 Elk <br /> <br />Denver, Color, riu 80?03 II <br />~~ <br />I <br />Phone: U071 86f,-3567 II <br />FAX: 003) 83? 8106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OF <br /> NATURAL <br /> RESOURCES <br /> Rey Romer <br />October 8, 1996 Gnvernw <br /> lames 5. Ln~ hhmd <br /> EaPRilrve Di4•dor <br /> M1LCh,iel tl. Lonti <br />Mr. Jim Stover Dimsinn nfreaur <br />J.E. Stover & Associates <br />2768 Compass Dr. -Suite 101 <br />Grand Junction, Co. 81506 <br />Re: Coal Ridge No. 1 Mine (C-84-065) <br />Technical Revision No. 13 <br />Permit Renewal Issues <br />Dear Mr. Stover, <br />The DMG has reviewed your letter dated September 9, 1996. The following are the <br />Division's responses to NCIG's concerns regarding TR-13 and permit renewal issues. <br />Identification of Interests <br />1. The DMG is still waiting to hear from NCIG regarding the corporation's present status <br />with the Secretary of State. <br />Reclamation Cost Estimate <br />2. The Division acknowledges that the work specified in tasks 1-4, 12-15, and 23 of our cost <br />estimate have been accomplished. As noted in your September 9, 1996 letter, the primary <br />purpose of estimating reclamation liability is to assure that the bond held by the State is <br />adequate to cover the cost of any remaining reclamation work. However, a secondary goal <br />of the Division in estimating liability at reclaimed sites is to track the amount of liability <br />which has not been formally released by the Division. <br />When computing reclamation cost estimates, the Division typically includes all tasks for <br />which liability release has not yet been approved. We realize that our cost estimate for the <br />Coal Ridge Mine is higher than the cost of completing work which actually remains to be <br />done. However, by tracking the estimated liability in this manner, calculation of bond <br />amounts which may be released at Phase II and III of the bond release process is more <br />straightforward. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.