My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV93082
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV93082
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:14:26 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:27:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981071
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/24/1984
Doc Name
Wildlife Mitigation Study
From
Colorado Yampa Coal
To
Fish and Wildlife Service
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />height diversity. However, this return of avian diversity and abundance can be <br />expected if trees or tall shrubs can be reestablished creating the necessary <br />foliage height and diversity. This is especially true in Tight of ail the <br />available aspen and mountain shrub communities adjacent to the area proposed for <br />mining from which reinvasion can occur. In order for this to be accomplished, a <br />major portion of the reclamation plan is committed to the reestablishment of the <br />existing community types as explained under the mitigation section of this <br />proposal. <br />HABITAT MAPPING <br />It is suggested that the vegetation cover types within a 3 to 5 mile radius <br />of the Little Middle Creek Tract be accurately mapped to determine the relative <br />availability of vegetation types. This work was completed in 1983 at the <br />suggestion of the USFWS and CUOW to quantify the habitat preferences of radio <br />collared elk. This data is available and has been accepted by both CDOW and <br />USFWS, and has been utilized in formulating our proposed mitigation plan. <br />ENSIVE WILDLIFE BASELINE INVENTORIES <br />CYCC has submitted site specific wildlife baseline studies collected in the <br />relevant area in 19/5, 1979, and continuously since 1980. Apparently USFWS <br />believes that the data is not adequate for current considerations. Submission <br />of intensive wildlife baseline data collected in similar habitat types of the <br />Edna Mine located within the proposed 5 mile radius has also apparently failed <br />to satisfy concerns of the USFWS. <br />7 Y'.:. .}k ti81eY `~49g19COR "i•wtiyl.w':. I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.