Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Jeff Deckler <br />October 21, 1985 <br />Page 5 <br />SUN COAL C~ANY'S BOND OBLIGATIONS = aseiunirY7 100Ai failure: <br />ACTUAL RECLAMATION COSTS <br />Topsoiling <br />Revegetation <br />Fertilizers <br />Seeding <br />Mulchi~ <br />Fencing <br />TOTAL ACTUAL RECLAMATION COSTS <br />$ 55,450.00 <br />5,250.00 <br />22,T20.00 <br />29,T50.00 <br />9,025.00 <br />$ 122,195.00 <br />ESTIMATED COSTS TO COMPLETE MONITORING & RECLAMATION ACTIVITIES <br />Revegetation Monitoring <br />(4th & 9th years) $ 20,000.00 <br />Water Quality Monitoring <br />(S1,000/yr for 10 yrs) 10,000.00 <br />Hackfill & Grading Monitoriig 10,000.00 <br />Sedimentation Pond Reclamation 20,000.00 <br />TOTAL ESTIMATED COS"PS TO COMPI~F.TE <br />MONITORING & RECLAMATION OBLIGATIONS $ 60,000.00 <br />TOTAL RHCLd1MATI0N COST OBLIGATION $ 182,195.00 <br />CML~ 30~ Administration Costs $ 18,219.50 <br />Tpq'pL ~~ cRrrrs~rr~ $ 200,414.50 <br />It must be pointed out that these costs are extremely conservative, <br />because it is improbable that Sun Coal Company will have 100At failure. If <br />assumptim~s used by EPA are used to calculate reasonable bonding casts, <br />the coats to fulfill lotg term revegetation obligations would be signifi- <br />cantly less. EPA assumes a 30Ai failure rate and, when applied to Sun's <br />reclamation oasts, the followi~ obligations would be required. <br />a :.,.....: u y <br />- - .l`9 ,~. - , ~ - <br />