My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92974
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92974
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:14:20 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:26:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
DECISION RECORD RATIONALE COAL LEASE APPLICAITON COC54558 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS U-93-24
Type & Sequence
PR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
effect water depletion and quality downstream in the Lower <br />Gunnison River and Upper Colorado River below the Gunnison <br />confluence. Even though there is no anticipated water use or <br />retention oP surface runoff waters proposed for the lease tract, <br />it is estimated that coal leasing would result in a generous <br />estimate of one acre foot of water lost to the North Fork of the <br />Gunnison and hence to the upper Colorado River. Water depletions <br />in the Upper Colorado River Basin has been recognized as a major <br />source oP impact to endangered fish species. Therefore, the <br />USFWS, through informal consultation, has determined that project <br />depletion impacts, can be offset by the water project proponent's <br />one-time contribution to the Recovery Program in the amount of <br />$11.50 per acre-foot of the project's average annual depletion <br />and by appropriate legal protection of in stream Plows pursuant <br />to State law. Because it is estimated that water depletion <br />resulting from the proposed action would be one acre-foot or less <br />annually and "may negatively affect" endangered fish species in <br />the upper Colorado River, BLM has initiated formal consultation <br />with the USFWS to receive a biological opinion on the "may <br />affect" determination. <br />Cultural Resources <br />impacts to cultural resources could occur if future surface <br />disturbances are proposed. These potential impacts can be <br />mitigated by a pre-activity cultural resource inventory prior to <br />surface disturbance. <br />ter Resource <br />Coal extraction or the resultant subsidence of overburden could <br />disrupt and drain ground water systems associated with the <br />ltesaverde Formation, quaternary deposits, or the local fault <br />systems. <br />Surface effects from subsidence could alter surface flow patterns <br />or intercept surface runoff waters. The severity of surface <br />subsidence would be q;eatest where the shallowest overburden <br />occurs. <br />These impacts will be mitigated by the mine plan review process. <br />The mine and reclamation plan will require the lessee, before <br />issuance of the mine permit, to inventory all adjudicated water <br />rights to quantify water sources (surface vs. ground water), <br />water quantity, and water quality. If, as a result of mining <br />activities, disruption to water quality or quantity occurs to any <br />of these water sources (as determined by comparing inventory data <br />to post mining conditions), the lessee will be responsible for <br />.rectification of the disruption. <br />Socioeconomics <br />Leasing federal lands would not affect the annual level of coal <br />production. Consequently, there would be no immediate impact on <br />local employment income or public revenues. However, the use of <br />the federal lease extends the mine life by 3.5 years which means <br />Page 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.