My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92930
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92930
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:14:18 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:25:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/4/1991
Doc Name
MEMO SENECA II-W PR1 SITE VISITIATION COMMENTS PN C-82-057
From
MLRD
To
DAN MATHEWS
Type & Sequence
PR1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ • • <br />Memo to Dan Mathews <br />Seneca II-W Comments <br />page 2 <br />The proposed site of Pond 005 is a large, currently active landslide complex. <br />I doubt that this area could be rendered capable of supporting the pond. <br />Unfortunately, few alternative areas present sufficient area to accommodate <br />the needed storage capacity. As one proceeds farther down the drainage the <br />increased source area increases the required pond capacity. Based upon my <br />cursory reconnaissance, I believe it may be necessary to erect multiple ponds <br />to accommodate the sediment capture and storage. A smaller pond could be <br />installed approximately half a mile downslope from the proposed Pond 005 <br />site. It may be possible to utilize an "in-pi t" pond to provide the <br />additional required storage, although this will significantly complicate the <br />operati on of the pi t. <br />Segments of Road G and Road H cross several active landslide depoisits. I <br />concur with Bruce's suggestion that these road segments will need careful <br />design or relocation in order to remain stable throughout the proposed life of <br />the operation. In many cases the location of these roads may be dictated by <br />requirements to achieve required maximum grades. I anticipate that careful <br />design to minimize disturbance of the slope or to retain the structure or <br />excavation may be required, Geotechnical analysis of representative slope <br />segments should be completed by the operator. <br />Tom Wainwright indicated that Peabody Coal has scheduled a site visitation by <br />Ground Engineering, Inc., which assisted the operator in the remedy of the <br />slope stability problems encountered at existing Pond 006. Peabody Coal <br />intends to solicit Ground Engineering to prepare a proposal for the required <br />geotechnical consul tation, <br />I have requested that Harry Ranney photograph the proposed permit expansion <br />area during his June 10/11 aerial reconnaissance flight. Low-altitude <br />stereographic aerial photography should significantly simplify the task of <br />identifying the landslide deposits within the proposed permit expansion area. <br />cc: Bruce Stover <br />Jim Stevens <br />Doc. Igo: 6140E <br />JP/jD <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.