My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92756
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92756
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:14:08 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:24:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1985029
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/8/1990
Doc Name
RESPONSE TO ADEQUACY LETTERS ALMA PLACER AMENDMENT NO 1 FN M-85-029 PURSUANT TO THE MLRB PRE HEARING
From
LAW OFFICES OF J KEMPER WILL
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
AM3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:~ ~ '., <br />• LAW OFFICES OF J. KEMPER WILL <br />• ONE DTC BUILDING <br />PENTHOUSE SIX <br />5251 DTC PARKWAY <br />ENGLEWOO D. CO BOIII <br />J. KEMPEP WALL <br />MOLLY $OMMEPVILLE <br />JOHN P. $CNMUCR <br />June 8, 1990 ~ ~ ~ E I V ~ <br />JUN B 179U <br />Larry D. Oehler MINED LANG <br />Reclamation Specialist RECLAMATION DIVI <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Response to Adequacy Letters, Alma Placer Amendment: <br />No. M-85-029, Pursuant to the Mined Land Reclamation <br />Hearing Order <br />Dear Mr. Oehler: <br />Enclosed please find the Reclamation Resource Inc. (RRZ <br />to the remaining adequacy concerns identified in the 1 <br />Reclamation Division (MLRD) letter of May 31, 1990. Itet <br />Order requires that RRI respond to the MLRDs adequacy le <br />are assuming that the letter of May 31, 1990 represents <br />unaddressed MLRD concerns. In addition, this correspl <br />intended to reflect our final changes and additions to <br />amendment, pursuant to item #1 of the pre-hearing order <br />To assist the public, RRI will restate the MLRD's <br />questions and concerns. <br />GENERAL <br />1. Craig Robbins appears on the list of adjacent la <br />a return receipt was not included as proof <br />notified. Please provide proof of notification. <br />~II ~I~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ <br />sss <br />T ELE Pr.ONE <br />(303) >96 - 2626 <br />T ELECO PIER <br />(303) >96 - 2»> <br />(303( >96 - 2>36 <br />1, File <br />rd Pre- <br />response <br />fined Land <br />#1 of the <br />.ters. We <br />.he sum of <br />ndence is <br />he permit <br />31, 1990 <br />lwners but <br />t he was <br />A copy of the notice was mailed to Craig Robbins on Marc 13, 1990. <br />The notice was mailed to the last address known to the P rk County <br />Clerk and Recorder. We have attached a copy of the eceipt we <br />retained at time of mailing. In an attempt to determine the final <br />disposition of the notice we have submitted forms to the U.S. <br />Postal Service to track the certified letter. <br />The U.S. Postal Service stated that the form would fir t have to <br />be forwarded to San Francisco, then to Oahu, and th to that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.