My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-05-31_REVISION - M2001088 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2001088
>
2006-05-31_REVISION - M2001088 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 6:08:14 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:23:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001088
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/31/2006
Doc Name
Second Adequacy Review
From
DMG sss
To
Map Surveys Inc.
Type & Sequence
CN1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 Will the topsoil and overburden stockpile stabilization seed mix be the same as the permanent <br />seed mix? It a temporary, fast growing and vigorous species is proposed to protect these <br />slockpdes, please provide the temporary seed mix and application specifications <br />10. Response acceptable. <br />Exhibit E • Reclamation Plan <br />11. Response acceptable. <br />12. Response acceptable. <br />13. Exhibit E specifies that a two foot deep retention pond would be used for slormwaler control, <br />while the response to this issue in the adequacy response letter indicates a three fool deep pond <br />would be used. Please clarify this discrepancy and provide specifications of the 10 year 24 hour <br />storm event. Include calculated volumes of water that will find iCs way to the detention pond <br />during the 10 yr124 hr event, <br />14. AS specified in the 110c permit, please include seed bed tilling, fertilizer type, application rate and <br />application method, application of certified weed free hay mulch at a rate of 1 ton per acre <br />anchored in by chmping. <br />15, Response acceptable. <br />Exhibit F -Reclamation Plan Map <br />16. Please revise the Reclamation plan map so the ten foot topographic lines tie in to existing <br />adjacent topographic lines. It appears that an area on the south side of Unit 1 will be steeper <br />than a 2:1 grade. This is acceptable only if this area was not disturbed by mining operations, or a <br />demonstration of stability for these over•steepened slopes is submitted. <br />17. Response acceptable. <br />Exhibit H -Wildlife Information <br />18, Response acceptable. <br />Exhibit J -Vegetation Information <br />19. Response acceptable. <br />Exhibit L -Reclamation Costs <br />20. Please indicate push/haul distances, volumes to be moved, and slope grade factors for each <br />task <br />21 Please revise this exhibit to account for required changes made to the reclamation plan in <br />addressing these remaining comments including grading, topsoil tilling, and associated <br />revegetalion tasks. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.