Laserfiche WebLink
<br />1 <br />~~ <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br />.1 <br />EVALUATION OF RECLAMATION SUCCESS FOR <br />PHASE II BOND RELEASE <br />........ .....:::::c:,:~:-r~:.;.s~:::»~:rs~;u~:o.s::;~s~:uta:;: axax::c:s:~.;~:.s;a~.:xrcw,::::se:azw.„.a~::v:~'~:,-;.:<r:::.;.::::>,.~:::.:a~:::.a:e.~s~':'s~:e:xx:::;:a':~::~::::~:x-.~n::a:::~:x:xr<::~~~::~.xsx~x:, m:~a.:M~s <br />The requirement for Phase II bond release <br />are replacement of topsoil according to the <br />approved topsoil replacement plan, <br />successful establishment of a diverse and <br />permanent vegetative cover as .described in <br />the reclamation plan, control of erosion <br />from the reclaimed area, and reestablishment <br />of essential hydrologic functions on alluvial <br />valley floors (DMG 1995). No alluvial <br />valley floors were present on the site prior <br />to mining so 'this criterion does nOt apply to <br />the Canadian Strip Mine. Achievement of <br />the other three requisites was documented by <br />sampling topsoil depth over the reclaimed <br />area, surveying the established vegetation <br />for cover and species composition, and <br />demonstrating that the reclaimed areas are <br />not contributing suspended solids to the <br />streamflow or runoff outside the permit area <br />in excess of pre_mitring levels. Each <br />condition and its supporting documentation <br />are discussed in the following sections. <br />sample per 5 acres. Sample depths ranged <br />from 0.5 feet to 1.5 feet. The average <br />topsoil depth was 11 inches (SD = 3.21). <br />Average topsoil depth, based on the <br />sampling program, exceeds the 0.5-foot goal <br />for topsoil replacement. Therefore, topsoil <br />replacement depths are considered adequate <br />for Phase II bond release. The DMG , / <br />approved topsoil depth in the previous !/ <br />partial Phase II release application in 1991 <br />(DMG 1991). <br />VEGETATIVE COVER <br />Vegetation on the reclaimed are s and <br />reference area was systematically ampled <br />during August, 1995. Vegetative cover, <br />shrub density, and species composite n were <br />evaluated. The results of the s dy are <br />summarized below. A detailed des ription <br />of the smdy•and analyses are pres nted in <br />Appendix A. <br />TOPSOIL REPLACEMENT <br />After the backfilling and recontouring <br />activities were completed, topsoil from the <br />storage stockpiles was distributed over the <br />disturbed areas according to 'the topsoil <br />replacement plan. Topsoil was distributed <br />so that the average depth over the entire <br />reclaimed area would be at least 0.5 feet, <br />the minimum depth considered acceptable by <br />the DMG (DMG 1987b). <br />To verify the adequacy of topsoil <br />redistribution, topsoil depth was sampled by <br />the DMG during November 1987 (DMG <br />1987a). Twenty sample locations were <br />selected over the 1987-reclaimed areas <br />(Figure 2). Consequently, sampling effort <br />was greater than the minimum of one <br />Survey results indicate permanen , self- <br />sustaining vegetation covered the re laimed <br />area. Mean total vegetative cover on the <br />1987-reclaimed area was 44.5 ercent. <br />Mean vegetative cover on the refere ce area <br />was 46.0 percent. Cover on the re laimed <br />area represents 96.5 percent ofthe r ference <br />area which is within the 90' percent <br />acceptable Phase II criteria. <br />Analysis of the species present indicates the <br />area is dominated by a variety of p rennial <br />species. Perennial grasses, for s, and <br />shrubs comprised approximately 100 percent <br />of the mean vegetative cover n the <br />reclaimed area. Analysis of the iversity <br />standard is provided in Appendix <br />' 92-01\Bond\09/07/95 6 <br />