My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92199
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:39 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:19:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/1/1995
Doc Name
SAN LUIS PROJECT PN M-88-112 TR-018
From
DMG
To
BMRI
Type & Sequence
TR18
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
:, <br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br /> <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AVD GEOLOGY <br />Dcparlmenl of N, rural Rewurces <br />111 3 Sherman SL. Koom ? 15 <br />Denver, Colorado RO?O7 <br />I'hunr: (3031 R66J 567 <br />FA\ 17031 R32 tl106 <br />November 1, 1995 <br />Ms. Sally Hayes <br />Battle Mountain Resources, Inc. <br />P. 0. Box 310 <br />San Luis, CO 81152-0310 <br />RE: SAN LUIS PROJECT - Permit No. M-88-112 - TR-018 <br />Dear Ms. Hayes: <br />II~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />koy R~~mrr <br />Guvm nor <br />fJmr~S Loc hheaA <br />Ea t Dine Durcuu <br />hL. ha c R Long <br />n.. ~.~~ ~~ one, it,~ <br />I finally had the opportunity to complete a review of BMRI's response <br />to the approval stipulations of TR-018. The Division accepts BMRI's <br />response to stipulation numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7, with the <br />following comments/requirements: <br />1) Stipulation No. 3: BMRI states that the volume of waste <br />rock placed into the West Pit will be reported to the <br />Division on a monthly basis. It is not the intent of the <br />Division to require monthly reporting from BMRI regarding <br />the amount of waste rock being placed in the West Pit. The <br />Division will only need to know the volume of waste rock if <br />it has to be removed (pursuant to Stipulation No. 1) The <br />Division will gladly accept monthly reports but they are <br />not required. <br />2) Stipulation No. 7: The Division received the Proposed <br />Monitoring and Water Quality Evaluation Plan fmr the West <br />Pit which was prepared by Halepaska and Associates. <br />Comments and/or concerns will be submitted to BMRI in the <br />near future. <br />BMRI's response to Stipulation No. 5 did not adequately address the <br />questions. According to Figure F-2 of TR-018, there is going to be <br />an outlet area on the south side of the West Pit which, after the pit <br />is backfilled, will allow surface runoff to exit the pit area. The <br />question I have is where will the surface runoff go once it exits the <br />pit area? It appears there are two possible scenarios. The runoff <br />could follow the county road to the west but will, ultimately, cross <br />over and end up in the Rito Seco. Or, the runoff may exit the outlet <br />area, cross the county road, and flow directly into the Rito Seco. <br />In order to protect the Rito Seco from sediment runoff, the Division <br />needs to know the direction of surface runoff once it leaves the pit <br />area. The Division recognizes that BMRI committed to controlling <br />sediment runoff from the partially backfilled pit with BMP's but made <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.