My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92144
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92144
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:36 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:18:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/16/2006
Doc Name
Comments & Responses
From
RTEA Colowyo Coal Company L.P.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR66
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Colowyo Mine C-1981-019 <br />Technical Revision 66 -Second Adequacy Review <br />Comments and Responses <br />November 16, 2006 <br />Based on the 24 October 2006 meeting and the Division's definition of worst- <br />case disturbance and the floating bond concept, the volumetrics for the <br />backfilling and rough grading of the East Pit, West Pit and Section 16 Pit need <br />t be updated in the Technical Revision 66 reclamation cost estimate. The <br />volumes in the reclamation cost estimate take into account some reclamation <br />of the pits that needs to be added back to the worst-case disturbance for the <br />current permit term. It was determined that the volumetrics used in Technical <br />Revision 61 represent as close to a worst-case disturbance for the current <br />permit term as practical. As decided during the meeting, please use the <br />volumes stated in the Technical Revision6l reclamation cost estimate for <br />the worst-case backfilling and rough grading volumes for the Technical <br />Revision 66 reclamation cost estimate. <br />Colowyo Response <br />As previously discussed, Colowyo has incorporated the volumetrics from <br />Technical Revision 61 into the Technical Revision 66 Bond Calculation as <br />requested <br />2. Based on the 24 October 2006 meeting and question #2 of the 21 September <br />2006 preliminary adequacy letter, Colowyo will need to add replacement costs <br />for the 300,000 cubic yards of additional topsoil stripped by the Bower <br />Brothers in advance of the West Pit to the Technical Revision 66 estimate. <br />This topsoil represents an additional disturbance above and beyond the <br />original worst case disturbance as determined and, as such, must be added to <br />the estimate. Additionally, as was discussed in the meeting, costs for topsoil <br />replacement are not subject to the floating bond concept so all topsoil <br />replacement cost must remain in the reclamation cost estimate until such a <br />time as a Phase II Bond Release has been applied for and approved. Please <br />add a cost for the replacement of the 300,000 yards of topsoil stripped by <br />the Bower Brothers in advance of the West Pit to the Technical Revision <br />66 reclamation cost estimate. <br />Colowvo Responee <br />The 300,000 cuyds. of topsoil that was salvaged as part of the Bower <br />Brothers project was not above and beyond the worst case disturbance, <br />please refer to Map 23 within the Colowyo's permit C-81-019. In addition <br />the majority of the Bower Brothers project resides within the pit limits of the <br />West Pit, which necessitated the removal of the topsoil for the active truck <br />shovel and dragline operation. <br />In summary, Colowyo has included the 300,000 cu. yds. of topsoil in the <br />reclamation bond estimate as discussed during our meeting. This inclusion <br />should satisfy all requirements for topsoil shipping for the remainder of the <br />West Pit <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.