My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV92120
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV92120
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:35 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:18:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/16/1996
Doc Name
MIDTERM REVIEW RESPONSE REVIEW FOIDEL CREEK MINE PN C-82-056
From
DMG
To
KENT GORHAM
Type & Sequence
MT3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EMD Dewatering Pad Road <br />This road needs a P.E. certification as per the Policy Memorandum and according <br />to Rule 4.03.2(1)(f)(i) for access roads. <br />Rock Dust Tank Access Road <br />This pre-1995 access road needs labeling on a map and a relevant showing as <br />described by Rule 4.03.2(I)(f)(ii). <br />Explosives Area Access Road <br />This road was originally permitted under the CYCC permit as Access Road G. It <br />needs labeled on a map and a relevant showing as described by Rule 4.03.2(1)(f)(ii). <br />Fish Creek Tipple Access Road <br />The present inactive status of this area would likely indicate that the road leading to <br />the Fish Creek Tipple is an access road. This road needs a relevant showing as <br />described by Rule 4.03.2(1)(f)(ii) and needs named and labeled on a map. <br />CYCC Office Access Road <br />This road was originally permitted under the CYCC permit as Access Road H. It <br />needs labeled on a map and a relevant showing as described by Rule 4.03.2(1)(f)(ii). <br />Three other sections of road identified are the Fish Creek Borehole Road, the road <br />to the North Escape Shaft, and the Rail Loop Access Road. The classification of <br />these roads is somewhat unclear at this time. TCC should make a decision as to the <br />use of these roads, which would appear to be a choice between access and light-use. <br />If any or all of these roads are to be access roads, a relevant showing will need to be <br />submitted and regardless of classification, the roads need named and labeled on a <br />map. <br /> <br />While [was looking at the submittal, I noted a few additional discrepancies. <br />Original Question <br />6. The Division has reviewed the Confidential Appendix -Table of Contents and <br />has the following comments. <br />e) Our copy does not contain Exhibit 45 -Coal Sample Results exists in our <br />copy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.