REV92047 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

03/19/2001 17:53 71957609 MOUNTAINDALE C~RD. I would like to rate that when I went down to Fremont County to copy a map of the quarry expansion I was not abk to do so. This trap contained general information that I wanted to have atmlyoed by mY hydrobgist aad the Fremont County cleric would rat elbw me to teJce it out of the office to copy. The county's copy machine was not large emugh to handle the document. In this case, public access to intportarrt informosiion oonoerning this amendment application was denied and unavailable es is rogttired. Red Canyon Quarry al9o trust be in compliance with their Conditional Use Pettus before their amendment application can be granted and of this writing a violation of their Conditional Cfse permit is pending. I have submitted 3 recent complaints to the Fremont Coonly Plaming end Zoning Department that oversees compliance with Red Crayon Quarry's (CCP). These complaints are in regard to the reporting of Satuday trucking that occtus st the quarry. I complained that in September 2000 Mr. Stack reported that there were only 2 ftatiuday trucking days when in fact there were 4 days that trucks hsubd out of the quarry. Mr. Stack responded that there was an administrative error a~ that these were indeed 4 Saturday truckutg days in September 2000. I have also compmined that ;n October of 20(10 Mr. Stack reported that there was only 1 Saturday trucking day m October while I videotaped, with National Public Radio Saturday Weeke~ Edition on in the background, 2 Saturdays that trucks hauled out of Red Canyon Quarry. Mr. Suck responded that there was only 1 Saturday that trucks battled in October. I have also Skd anther corty~laint that Mr. Stack reported that there was no Snttuday ttuclting days in January 2001.. I videotaped trucks agaiq with National Public Raidio Saturday Weekerd Edition on in. the background, hautiutg from the quarry on I Saturday in Jetrttary 2001. I also object to the expansion o£this quazry because the extension oftbe proposod'Tsloe avoidmce Arass° would potentially result in a taking ofthe Mexican Spotted Owl (Strht occidentalis lucida) a species under the Endangered Species Act. Terry Ireland (FWS) drew a boundary line where quarrying could take place without owl monitoring and without obtaining an incidental take permit and the preparation of a hab8et corteervadon pha (FICP). Neither an HCP, incidental take permit or owl monitoring study have been provided wnh thiv application and without these docwneats this amendment is PAGE a2 ,~ sk '~ T ~~ .~ H {' .,a .. ~ a: ~~; ,~ ~i