Laserfiche WebLink
-5- <br />By far the most limiting factor with respect to topsoil suitability was <br />high clay content. Since both overburden and topsail show high <br />variability in parameters analyzed with respect to location in the pit <br />and surface position (topsoil in swales versus upland areas), KCC must, <br />at the least, maintain the baseline data and suitability ratings for both <br />overburden and topsoil as previously used and approved so the Permit <br />Application Package complies with Rules 2.04,6 and 2,05,4(2)(d). The <br />approved tables that should be included in the proposed permit revision <br />package are Tables 43a, 46, 48, 73a, and (if applicable) 78, Please <br />revise Table 5a (currently Table 15) to reflect all of the baseline <br />information. <br />24. It is impossible to verify Table 34 - Topsoil Suitability Comparison <br />(with respect to overburden values) since the baseline data used to <br />compile the table cannot be found in the present Permit Revision <br />document. The Division believes that Table 34 cannot be used to <br />determine specific management practices for specific materials in the <br />field. For the reasons stated above and in previous questions, Table 34 <br />should be removed from the permit revision package because it does not <br />adequately or accurately portray actual field conditions at the Marr Mine. <br />25. Statements in Permit Revision 1 indicate that, in some cases, Wyoming DEO <br />or Montana DSL suitability criteria will be applied and, in other cases, <br />these criteria are not applicable. What specific criteria will KCC use <br />to determine topsoil suitability as a plant growth medium? <br />26. In the discussion to support the contention that less topsoil replacement <br />will enhance the reclamation objectives, Marr baseline data and several <br />studies are cited. Although not all the papers cited were read, some <br />have been reviewed and comments are offered, in the accompanying Appendix <br />A. The contention that 6 inches of topsoil will enhance reclamation of <br />the mined areas is discussed in section 4.06 of the Permit Revision <br />Package. However, upon closer examination of each piece of evidence <br />presented by KCC, as noted in Appendix A, the Division has found support <br />for Rule 4.06 which requires that mine operators salvage all available <br />topsoil. <br />27, a. On page 4.06-11, KCC states that "...the available data indicate no <br />significant increases in plant response for topsoil depths greater <br />than two inches." To what available data is KCC referring to? <br />b. In the second paragraph of page 4.06-11, KCC refers to a study <br />conducted in the Piceance Basin evaluating the effect of soil <br />mixing versus replacing soils in reverse order. To which study is <br />KCC referring? <br />28. The Division must consider reclamation to be successful when an area has <br />been reclaimed according to the standards put forth by Rule 4. KCC has <br />attempted to demonstrate that 6 inches of replaced topsoil over spoil, no <br />matter what the specific quality of these materials, will achieve the <br />stated reclamation goals of increasing Wyoming big sagebrush <br />