Laserfiche WebLink
-- -- <br />•I ~~~ I~~I~~i~~ll~~'~~ <br />March 7, 1995 <br />DGMC /BOB HILL • <br />PO BOX 96 ~~~'~' <br />HESPERUS, CO 81326 0~~+~ <br />Tom Gillis <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Durango Field Office <br />1474 Main Avenue <br />Room 223 <br />Durango, Colorado 81302 <br />303 247 5062 <br />Received <br />lfAR 101995 <br />Durango Ftekl Office <br />Diviaon of Minerals 8 Geology <br />RE: Review, Incas Mine Amendment, Permit No: M-86-076, Amendment No AM- <br />002, Response to Hydrology Review, Final Comments from Tom Schreiner to Tom <br />Gillis, dated March 2, 1995. <br />The information in the following text in the double outlined boxes in bold print <br />II Copied from a document dated 3/2/95 from Tom Schreiner to Tom Gillis II <br />has been copied from a document tlatetl March 1, 7 yab, from tom Schreiner to <br />Tom Gillis of the State of Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology. This <br />document is part of the Review, Incas Mine Amendment, Permit No: M-86-076, <br />Amendment No AM-002, Response to Hydrology Review, Final Comments from <br />Tom Schreiner to Tom Gillis, dated March 2, 1995. The responses following each <br />double outlined bold faced portion of the text are responses by DGMC /Bob Hill to <br />the questions raised by Tom Schreiner of the DMG. <br />The responses contained in this document will serve as corrections, explanations, <br />and additional information to previously submitted information. Because some of <br />the concerns raised in the document from Tom Schreiner were in responded to in <br />previously submitted responses to a document from Dr. Harry Posey, those <br />responses will also have to be referenced. This document will contain the <br />definitive information in a disagreement with previously submitted information. <br />xxxxxxxxxxzxxxxaxxxxaazxxa~cxzxaxxxxxxxxxzxxxxxxxxxx~cxxxxaxxxxxxxxzx~cxzxxaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxzxxxxxxxxxxxxx <br />I have completed my review of Bob Hill's response to my adequacy Comments o <br />November 18, 1994 as well as follow-up comments by Dr. Harry Posey of the <br />DMG. I offer the comments listed below in addition to Dr. Posey's comments of <br />February 20, 1995. At this stage in the permitting process, it appears that the <br />applicant has not adequately addressed all adequacy questions regarding <br />protection of surface and ground water resources, has not adequately <br />demonstrated a benign filter cake/waste rock mix, has not provided sufficient <br />dmg-19 \ dgmc 2 3/7/95 <br />