My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91908
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91908
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:24 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:16:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981032
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/6/1996
Doc Name
EFFECTS OF PONDS ON FLOODS
From
KENNETH L WAHL
To
ERICA CROSBY
Type & Sequence
TR12
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
x <br />sii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii <br />999 <br />To: <erica.crosby@state.co.us> <br />Cc: <rltort@usgs.gov>,<pbvongue@usgs.gov>,<mesmith@usgs.gov> <br /><hotch@usgs.gov> <br />"Kenneth L Wahl, Hydrologist, Denver, CO" <klwahl@usgs.gov> <br />Bcc: <br />From: <br />Subject: <br />Date: <br />Attach: <br />Certify: <br />Forwarded by: <br />Dear Ms. Crosby: <br />"Kenneth L Wahl, Hydrologist, Denver, CO "<klwahl@usgs.gov> <br />Effects of ponds on floods <br />Friday, December 6, 1996 11:29:18 MST <br />N <br />Bill Hotchkiss forwarded your request to me. There are several studies, in <br />addition to the Texas study, that may be relevant to your situation. <br />Livingston and Minges (1987) studied flood frequencies of small rural basins <br />in Eastern Colorado that included SCS (now NRCS) erosion-control and <br />flood-retarding structures. They used rainfall-runoff modeling and <br />regression procedures in their study and concluded that for estimating flood <br />frequency, effective drainage area (that area downstream from the structures) <br />should be used instead of total area. A similar study in Oklahoma <br />(Tortorelli and Bergman, 1984) routed water through flood-water retarding <br />stuctures on small basins and concluded that the small reservoirs, even <br />though designed for the 25-year flood, effectively delayed passage of flood <br />peaks from larger floods such that the controlled part of the basin added <br />little to the peak produced by the uncontrolled part of the basin. <br />The references for the above reports are: <br />Livingston, R.K., and Minges, D.R., 1987, Techniques of Estimating Regional <br />Flood Characteristics of Small Rural Watersheds in the Plains Region of <br />Eastern Colorado: U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations <br />Report 87-4094, 72 p. <br />Tortorelli, R.L., and Bergman, D.L., 1984, Techiques for Estimating Flood <br />Peak Discharges for Unregulated Streams and Streams Regulated by Small <br />''Floodwater Retarding Structures in Oklahoma: U.S. Geological Survey <br />Water-Resources Investigations Report 84-4358, 92 p. <br />The Colorado report may be in Xour library. If not, a copy may be available <br />from our Colorado District Office in Lakewood (telephone 303 236-4882). The <br />best bet for the Oklahoma report, should you want to get a copy, would be <br />from the Oklahoma District in Oklahoma City (telephone 405 843-7570). <br />You may also wish to contact Paul Von Guerard, <br />Grand Junction (telephone 970 245-5257). Paul <br />1980's on sediment yields in the Piceance basin <br />about the effectiveness of the sediment control <br />Ken Wahl, <br />USGS, Central Region Office <br />Forwarded Message <br />the chief of our office in <br />did some work in the early <br />and may have information <br />structures. <br />erica.crosby@state.co.us said: <br />> Dear Mr. Hotchkiss, <br />> I spoke with you briefly at the CMC meeting last night regarding possible <br />> research done on peak flow reduction due to detention basins. I work with <br />> the Department of Natural Resources; Division of Minerals and Geology. In my <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.