Laserfiche WebLink
>. <br />[4ined Land Reclamation Division <br />July 24, 1989 <br />Page 2 <br />(1~ v <br />7~ <br />7 •~ ~ <br />. ~~. <br />1'/ . <br />, /~ <br />.~ <br />Rtr , ~ . 2 <br />~ -i <br />`y l.. <br />4. It fails to take into account usual and customary effici- <br />encies attained by contractors operating as independent <br />contractors within the industry; <br />5. It duplicates overhead expenses; and <br />6. It fails to realistically evaluate the scope of the work, <br />location and market conditions which might otherwise <br />affect price. <br />L4e also take exception to the bond amount to the extent of <br />any sum remaining included in the bond for a stabilization study <br />or for stabilization work in excess of the quantities, at the <br />dollar rates, provided by Rockcastle to you. <br />~,:~1~ <br />I am in the process of recontacting Pir. Sherman regarding the / •~~ <br />AOC item on Pits 5 and 6 and ditch calculations. It may well be obJ ~~ <br />that we are willing to accept those stipulations; however,-~I have <br />not had cost analyses made available to me and, therefore, am not <br />in a position to state that the Rockcastle Company will accept <br />those stipulations. It is my understanding that the Division con- <br />ducted a survey of Pits 5 and 6 sometime in the early summer of <br />1988. To my knowledge, the results of that information have not <br />been made available to us; however, it may be beneficial, upon the <br />sharing of that knowledge, for us to confer on the extent to which <br />additional effort is required of The Rockcastle Company. <br />Please accept this letter as the request of The Rockcastle <br />Company for hearing pursuant to the appropriate provisions of the <br />Colorado Code of Regulations and the Mined Land Reclamation Act. <br />I am unsure of the Board's meeting schedule. <br />As you know, the involved representatives of The Rockcastle <br />Company are no longer located in Colorado. I would appreciate as <br />much advance notice of a proposed hearing date as possible. It <br />would be my preference that the hearing not be held until Septem- <br />ber simply because of pressures on my own schedule occuring during <br />the month of August. If you have questions, please feel free to <br />contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />KORB & CARROLL~ <br />By: ~. ~~-~ ~. <br />-/ <br />1' <br />