Laserfiche WebLink
IN REPLY REFER TO: <br />United States Department of the Interior ~~ <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br />Reclamation and Enforcement <br />P.O. Box 46667' <br />Denver, Colorado 80201-6667 EC'E~VEp <br />January 27, 2005 <br />AN 3 z 2005 <br />~ivislon of Minerals G G~IaJY <br />Chandra Rosenthal <br />Rocky Mountain Director <br />Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility <br />P.O. Box 280396 <br />Lakewood, CO 80228 <br />Deaz Ms. Rosenthal: <br />This is in response to your January 7, 2005, letter (received via a-mail) concerning two bond <br />release decisions by the Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG). The Colorado <br />Departrnent of Natural Resources is the State regulatory authority responsible for surface coal <br />mining and reclamation operations in Colorado, and DMG is the division responsible for <br />administrating regulatory program. The Departrnent of the Interior approved the Colorado <br />regulatory program effective December 15, 1980, and beginning on that date-the Department of <br />Natural Resources and DMG received primacy for the regulation of surface coal mining and <br />reclamation operations onnon-Federal and non-Indian lands in Colorado. <br />The Office of Surface Mining (OSM) is responsible for implementing the provisions of the <br />Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act. OSM's Western Region and the Denver Field <br />Division (DFD) are responsible for oversight of the administration of the Colorado State <br />program. <br />The Colorado State program includes provisions for performance bond release as noted in your <br />letter, and found at: "Rule 3 Performance Bond Requirements, and Section 3.03 Release of <br />Performance Bonds". OSM is involved in applications for performance bond release in our <br />oversight capacity. DFD participated in the field review of each of the bond release applications <br />you note in your letter, Snowcap Coal Co., Bond release application SL-02, and Bowie <br />Resources Ltd., Bowie No. 1 Mine, Bond release application SI.r02. <br />We believe your concerns with respect to the bond release actions are captured on page three of <br />your letter with the summary statement: "We object only to part of Phase I bond being <br />released on the areas of these mines where backfilling, regrading, and drainage control had <br />not been completed." At the time of the bond releases through its oversight activities, DFD did <br />have concern with release of bond for structural demolition. However; under OSM Directive <br />REG-8, oversight is not to be process driven. Instead, oversight is to focus on the on-the- <br />ground/end result success of the State program in achieving the purposes of the Act. As <br />described below the State fully documented the monies released for reclamation work <br />l~~~M~~~ <br />