My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91728
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91728
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:14 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:14:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/18/2006
Doc Name
Adequacy Review & Attachments
From
DMG
To
Bowie Resources, LLC
Type & Sequence
PR10
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Bowie Resources LLC <br />Permit No. C-1996-083 <br />PR-10 Preliminary Adequacy Review <br />Page 7 of 8 <br />outstanding adequacy issues, TR-22 was withdrawn on August 18, 2003. However, two <br />unresolved issues from TR-22 are still relevant to the adequacy review for PR-10. <br />A. In TR-22, the Division requested that a demonstration be made that the modified <br />earthquake-generated seismic signal used in the Bruce Park dam seismic analysis <br />reasonably approximates a seismic signal generated from longwall mining at the <br />Bowie No. 2 Mine. Please provide such a demonstration. <br />B. In the TR-22 review, the Division received a letter from the Colorado Division of <br />Water Resources (DWR), dated June 11, 2003, in which additional information <br />was requested concerning the landslide immediately adjacent to the Bruce Park <br />main dam. A copy of this letter is attached. Please submit these data and report, <br />per the recommendations described in the DWR letter of June 11, 2003, as part of <br />the adequacy review for PR-10. <br />32. The Division has received several comment letters from various governmental agencies <br />and organizations concerning the activities proposed in PR-10. Some of these comment <br />letters have already been forwazded to BRL. Attached to this adequacy review letter aze <br />copies of all of the comment letters. Issues brought up in these comment letters that relate <br />to the Division's jurisdiction have a corresponding question or comment from the <br />Division as well. The following are the comment letters that aze attached: <br />A. Letter, dated March I5, 2006, from the Colorado Historical Society. <br />B. Letter, dated March 20, 2006, from the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of <br />Land Management. <br />C. Letter, dated March 20, 2006, from the U.S. Department of the Interior Office of <br />Surface Mining. <br />D. Letter, dated March 27, 2006, from the Colorado Division of Water Resources <br />(Denver). <br />E. Letter, dated March 29, 2006, from the Colorado Historical Society. <br />F. Letter, dated April l3, 2006, from the Boazd of Delta County Commissioners. <br />G. Letter, dated May 1, 2006, from the Western Slope Environmental Resource <br />Council. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.