My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91571
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91571
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:13:05 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:12:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/30/1999
Doc Name
COSTILLA CNTY CONSERVANCY DISTRICT CCCD COMMENTS ON MARCH 1999 REPORT MLRB BY BMRI SAN LUIS PROJECT
From
KELLY/HAGLUND/GARNSEY & KAHN LLC
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
TR26
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. ~~~ <br />Premiere Building <br />825 Delaware Avenue, Suite 500 <br />Longmont, Colorado 80501 <br />Metro (303) 665-6283 <br />April 22, 1999 FAX (303) 772-5282 <br />E-mail rmclong@rmii.com <br />Ms. Lori Potter <br />Kelly/Haglund/Garnsey & Kahn <br />1441 18"' Street, Suite 300 <br />Denver, Colorado 80202-1255 <br />RE: REVIEW OF h1ARCH 22, 1999 BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, INC, SAN LUIS <br />PROJECT DOCUMENT "TR-26 WATER MANAGEMENT IN THE WEST PIT AREA" <br />Dear Lori: <br />Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. (RMC) has reviewed the March 22, 1999 Battle Mountain <br />Resources, Inc. (BMRI) document entitled "TR-26 Water Management in [he West Pit Area, San Luis <br />Project, Costilla County, Colorado." RMC performed our review at the request of Mr. Mike <br />McGowan of the Costilla County Conservancy District (CCCD). Our comments on this document <br />are provided below. <br />GENERAL COMMENTS <br />1. The document does not contain sufficient data to independently verify it's conclusions and <br />t,~ recommendations. Specifically, only time-series chemical data are presented for manganese <br />and sulfate, while the screening level risk assessment (Appendix D) presents only summary <br />statistics for Rito Seco chemistry data. Absent the raw historical chemistry, stream flow, and <br />groundwater level data, it is difficult to assess the adequacy of the proposed monitoring plan <br />presented in Section 6. <br />While the current surface water standard exceedences may be limited to sulfate and <br />ho manganese, trend analysis should be performed on all parameters to identify If increasing <br />trends are present in additional parameters that might pose future exceedences. <br />3. Although the document is not clear on the duration of the "long-term water management <br />'' plan", it appears that BMRI is proposing to install what can be essentially described as a <br />large-scale pump-and-treat system, and subsequently operate this system in perpetuity. <br />Given the unknown time frame over which this system must perform, it is in interest of the <br />CCCD and all downstream water users for the BMRI to implement a remedial action that is <br />effective, redundant, and has associated low operation and maintenance (O & M) costs. <br />While the proposed system appears to be effective, it has limited redundancy. Although no <br />cost analysis is presented in the document, we anticipate that the system proposed by BMRI <br />will have high O & M costs. <br />CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • PLANNING <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.