My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91351
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91351
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:12:54 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:10:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981022
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
9/24/1992
Doc Name
SOMERSET MINING CO PERMIT REVISION PR-02 ADEQUACY REVIEW 3 PN C-81-022
From
J E STOVER & ASSOCIATES
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
PR2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
" ~ J. ~. STOVER & ASSG~CI~ES <br />2768 COMPASS DRIVE, SUITE 10 <br />GRAND JUNCTION, COLORADO 81506 <br />PHONE: (303) 245-4101, FAR 242-7908 <br />NINE ENGINEERING <br />MINE RECLAMATION <br />September 23, 1992 <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />CIVIL ENGINEERING <br />CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT <br /> <br />S. s. shuey SEP 24 1992 <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 ` <br />MINEF1A~o ti liww. <br />Re: Somerset Mining Company <br />Permit Revision PR-02, Adequacy Review #3 <br />Permit C-81-022 <br />Dear Mr. Shuey: <br />The Division's letter to Somerset Mining Company dated September <br />21, 1992 transmitted its review and comments regarding Somerset's <br />second adequacy review responses. Following are Somerset's <br />responses to the Division's additional questions and comments. <br />1) -13) No response required. <br />14a - c) A discussion of the maximum 50$ recovery under flooded <br />workings is included on new page 2.05-4iii and revised <br />page 2.05-5. <br />Maps 5-007-C and 5-007-B were shaded as requested to show <br />the areas where recovery is restricted to 50$. <br />A commitment to address the possible large inflows from <br />drill hole #B during the upcoming renewal was included on <br />new page 2.05-39ivb. <br />14d) The underground sump shown on Map 5-007-B was labeled as <br />requested. <br />The Division's comment regarding taking the discharge <br />pond off-line is noted. <br />14e - g) No response required. <br />15 - 20) No response required. <br />21) Page 2.04-53i was revised to incorporate a statement that <br />the operator would augment the flow in the North Fork of <br />the Gunnison River if any reduction in flow from the <br />undermined ephemeral drainages or springs is attributed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.