My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91274
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91274
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:12:50 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:09:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980244
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/25/1998
Doc Name
CC&VG CRESSON PROJECT GEOTECHNICAL FINDINGS AUGUST 1998 AMENDMENT 7 APPLICATION PN M-80-244
From
DMG
To
BERHAN KEFFELEW
Type & Sequence
AM7
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Berhan Keffelew <br />CRESSON AM#7 Geotechoical Findings <br />page 4 <br />minimum static slope safety factor of 1.4 is acceptable for the Lower Squaw Gulch Overburden <br />Storage area. This finding is limited to this specific facility at the CRESSON site, only. <br />As a portion of its design, CC&VG proposed to permanently convey surface drainage from the <br />Upper Squaw Gulch Overburden Storage Area beneath the Lower Squaw Gulch Overburden <br />Storage Area in a rock underdrain placed by gravity segregation with a 24" diameter AD N-12 <br />pipe and riser (details depicted on Drawings 3, 4 and 5 in Appendix 5). This proposal is <br />acceptable to the Division during the operational life of the storage area, during which frequent <br />observation will allow maintenance if the trash rack or pipe inflow were to clog. Following <br />completion of the Lower Squaw Gulch Overburden Storage area, however, observation and <br />maintenance will be less intense. For this reason, the Division will require that the storm water <br />surface diversion system for the Lower Squaw Gulch Overburden Storage Area be properly sized <br />to accommodate the entire projected runoff from the up gradient Squaw Gulch drainage. <br />The Division informed CC&V that the structure will have to demonstrated to be stable in the <br />event the redundant underdrain is compromised, in order for CC&V to retain the Lower Squaw <br />Gulch Overburden Storage azea as a permanent cross-valley fill. To provide this demonstration, <br />CC&V would need to complete a stability evaluation, including consideration of an appropriate <br />dam embankment phreatic surface reflecting impoundment of a pool above the fill. Further, <br />CC&V would need to revise the surface drainage facility designs to provide an appropriately <br />sized emergency spillway. <br />CC&V has chosen "to construct that portion of the Lower Squaw Gulch Overburden Storage <br />Area only as high as will allow surface water draining from the area upgradient of the upstream <br />toe of that earth fill to continue to drain over and azound the earth fill." CC&V will observe this <br />limitation until it has addressed the progression of construction and the underdrain system to the <br />Division's satisfaction. <br />DI....~:_..- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.