My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV91006
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV91006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:12:37 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:08:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
10/2/1995
Doc Name
EDNA MINE PN C-80-001 TR 32
From
DMG
To
PITTSBURG & MIDWAY COAL MINING CO
Type & Sequence
TR32
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.. <br />III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Departmem ul N,n oral Kc,oorces <br />1313 $herm, n SL, Knum 21 5 <br />Denver, Coluratlu NII_U i <br />Phone 1303) 741,1, 15b7 , <br />FA%: (3031 fl3'-111116 <br />October 2, 1995 <br />David L. Beverlin <br />Edna Mine <br />The Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Company <br />P.O. Box 176 <br />Oak Creek, Colorado 80467 <br />RE: Edna Mine (C-80-001) <br />Technical Revision 32 <br />Dear Mr. Beverlin: <br />II~~~ <br />DEPARTMEIJT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames 5 Lochhead <br />E aemlive Direao. <br />Michael B. Long <br />Division Di~eclur <br />The Division has completed a preliminary adequacy review of the above mentioned application. <br />As a result of that review, we have the following questions and comments. <br />1. The cover letter states that copies of cover letters, to transmit the application to various <br />federal agencies, were attached. The Division did not receive those copies. Was the <br />revision forwarded to the BLM and OSM? Please inform the Division when the revision <br />will be or was sent to them. <br />2. Rule 4.05.9(1)(a) requires that the quality of water in permanent impoundments must be <br />suitable, on a year round basis for its intended use. P&M indicates the intended use is <br />for livestock and wildlife. Therefore, the water quality standards for livestock would <br />apply. I have enclosed a copy of those standards, taken from the Division's Proposed <br />Decision and Findings of Compliance document for Permit Revision No. 3 at the Edna <br />Mine. Please provide the Division with documentation that the quality of water <br />impounded in the Moffat pond will meet these criteria on a year round basis. <br />3. In accordance with Rule 4.05.9(d), before the Division can approve permanent retention <br />of the Moffat pond, P&M needs to provide proof that the necessary water rights have <br />been secured for retention of the permanent pool volume in the pond. Your cover letter <br />indicated this would be provided to the Division as soon as it becomes available. Receipt <br />of that documentation should satisfy this concern. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.