Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PARCEL, MAURO, HULTIN & SPAANSTRA, P.(J. <br />ATTORNEYS AT lAW <br />SUITE ]600 <br />IB O~ CALIFO aNIA STREET <br />DENVER. COLORA00 80202 <br />TELEPHONE13031292~6a00 <br />DEAN R. MASSEY TxEECORIEa uom z9saoao <br />January 18, 1990 <br />DELIVERED BY FEDERAL EXPRESS <br />Mr. Neal Cohen <br />Ireland, Stapleton, Pryor & Pascoe, P.C. <br />1675 Broadway, Suite 2600 <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br />Re: Battle Mountain Resources Permit <br />Amendment Application <br />File No. N-88-112 <br />Dear Mr. Cohen: <br />We have been advised by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation <br />Division (MLRD) that you have filed a request for party status on <br />behalf of CES in the above referenced matter. That notification <br />indicated that your request for party status was not received prior <br />to the deadline established in the Prehearing Order issued by the <br />Mined Land Reclamation Board. On the basis of that notification <br />we understand that CES's party status in that proceeding must be <br />subsequently determined by the Mined Land Reclamation Board. <br />Nevertheless, we are forwarding the following documents to you as <br />required by the Prehearing order issued by the Mined Land Reclama- <br />tion Board for this proceeding: <br />1. Battle Mountain's response to MLRD's concerns with Battle <br />Mountain's adequacy response. <br />2. Battle Mountain's List of Witnesses and Evidence to be <br />presented at the January 25, 1990 Board meeting. <br />Our transmittal of the adequacy response document:: should not <br />be interpreted as acknowledgement of CES's party stetitus and we <br />specifically reserve our right to challenge party status when that <br />issue is debated before the Mined Land Reclamation Board. <br />