Laserfiche WebLink
~Y ~.. <br />• • <br />87 <br />IMPROVED HAUL ROAD BERM DESIGN <br />By Gregory G. Miller,l Gary L. Stecklein,2 and John J. Labra3 <br />INTRODUCTION <br />Parts 55 and 77 of the Code of Federal <br />Regulations, Title 30--Mineral Resources, <br />require that "berms or guards be provided <br />on the outer bank of elevated roadways" <br />at metal and nonmetal open pit mines and <br />at surface coal mines to prevent haulage <br />vehicles from running off the haul road. <br />The proper design and construction of <br />haul road berms are not known, other than <br />the current rule-of-thumb recommendation <br />that berms be built as high as the axle <br />height of the largest haulage truck using <br />the haul road. However, interviews with <br />mine personnel indicate that berms built <br />to this height are ineffective in stop- <br />ping runaway vehicles. <br />A wide variety of restraint systems <br />ate available. These systems are edge- <br />of-road berms, guardrails, boulders, <br />concrete barriers, median berms, and es- <br />cape lanes. Mine operators overwhelming- <br />ly prefer berms constructed of waste ma- <br />terial because they feel that they are <br />the least costly system since the waste <br />material has to be transported along the <br />haul road anyway. While the cost of the <br />berm material may be negligible, addi- <br />tional costs are incurred owing to con- <br />struction time and additional road width <br />necessary to carry the berm. <br />To determine the proper design of safe <br />haul road restraint systems, research was <br />conducted by Southwest Research Insti- <br />tute4 for the Bureau of Mines on design <br />requirements for edge-of-road berms, <br />guardrails, boulders, concrete barriers, <br />median berms, and escape lanes. <br />LOCATION OF RESTRAINT SYSTEMS <br />Restraint systems such as berms should <br />be used on all elevated roadways to pre- <br />vent vehicles from going over the road <br />edge embankment. The design requirements <br />are dependent on the maximum possible <br />runaway vehicle approach conditions. It <br />is obvious that certain locations along <br />the roadway such as downgrades and sharp <br />turns must have restraint systems, but <br />since mechanical failure, adverse weath- <br />er, or human error can cause accidents, <br />flat elevated roadways also must have <br />them. <br />METHODS OF VEHICLE-BARRIER INTERACTION ANALYSIS <br />To determine Che effectiveness of vari- <br />ous restraint systems, the following ap- <br />proach was used: <br />1. Geometric-scale model simulations. <br />2. Full-scale field tests. <br />3. Computer simulation. <br />The runaway vehicle approach conditions <br />of 30 mph and a 30° impact were consid- <br />ered maximum. While the speeds of most <br />runaway haulage vehicles are lower, a <br />berm designed to withstand these impact <br />Mechanical engineer, Spokane Research <br />Center, Bureau of Mines, Spokane, WA. <br />2Mechanical engineer, Southwest Re- <br />search Institute, San Antonio, TX. <br />3Computer analyst, Southwest Research <br />Institute, San Antonio, TX. <br />4Stecklein, G. L., and J. Labra. Haul- <br />road Berm and Guardrail Design Study <br />and Demonstration. Volume I (contract <br />H0282028, Southwest Res. Inst.). BuMines <br />OFR 188-82, 1981, 186 pp.; NTIS PB 83- <br />137091. <br />