Laserfiche WebLink
',~,~ CORE LABOF~ATORIES <br />Western Atlas <br />International <br />' TITLE <br />ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY DIVISION QUALITY ASSURANCE MANUAL <br />' SOP NO. REVISION NO. EFFECTIVE DATE PAGE <br />HC-QAC-02 0 1 /06/92 89 of 104 <br />• Compare raw laboratory data documentation to the data entered in LIMS <br />for several parameters. <br />' • Spot-check data calculations, dilution factors, etc. for several different <br />parameters. <br />• Verify that the required data review and validation documentation is <br />present. <br />14.5 Final Report Review And Approva{ <br />Laboratory section supervisors, project managers, the QA/d2C coordinator, or <br />the laboratory manager are responsible for approving the final reportable <br />package which is delivered to the client. The following items must be verified, <br />before releasing the final analytical and quality assurance deports. <br />I' Final analytical report format and content is appropriate and meets client <br />and regulatory requirements. <br />' • Review the final analytical and quality assurance reports ~o assure that the <br />data reported is correct (significant figures, method references, detection <br />limits, units, and date and time analyzed). <br />' • Verify that any additional quality assurance reportables requested by the <br />client are provided (matrix spike duplicates, copies of raw lab data, <br />' surrogate recoveries, etc.) <br />• Analytical and quality assurance problems associated with that job are <br />' documented and included in both the job file and final report, when <br />necessary. <br />• Decisions made to report data which deviates from rhethod-specified <br />requirements are documented and included in both the job file and final <br />report. <br />' • Analytical and quality assurance problems are addressed and appropriate <br />' corrective action is taken and documented to minimize or eliminate the <br />problem. <br /> <br />