My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-02-28_REVISION - M1992045 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1992045
>
2005-02-28_REVISION - M1992045 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:58:15 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:04:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1992045
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
2/28/2005
Doc Name
Email Notice of DMG Letter
From
DMG
To
James VanElla
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 1 of 1 <br />James VAN eLL,A <br />From: "Jim VanElla" <goldbasin@hotmail.com> <br />To: <carl.mount@state.co.us>; <gold(i~iwi.com> <br />Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 8:39 AM <br />Carl, <br />I am trying to fill out the Conversion Application permit for Gold Basin Mine. As I read <br />through it I came upon the Responsibilities as a Permittee and the first requirement is that it <br />is our obligation to reclaim the site not limited to the amount of the financial warranty. That <br />we would assume legal liability for all reasonable expenses which the Board or the Office <br />may incur to reclaim the affected lands associated with our mining operation in the event our <br />permit is revoked and financial wazranty is forfeited. <br />As you know from being on the site last September, 2004 there has been much disturbition <br />beginning back as faz as 1928. The distrubitance should be noted on some type of legal <br />disclosure that there is approximately an 8 acre pit 30 feet deep to bed rock and <br />approximately 300 feet wide. Also continuing approximately 15 acres of disturbance <br />running down to the property line. This is approximately 600 feet wide. We don't feel we <br />should be held responsible for that reclaimation. We would need some written document <br />from your division stating that this predistribution is well known and documented. We aze <br />repeating ourselves but we want this made very clear. <br />If you recall, the division even after many years of not billing us yearly for assement on the <br />Emma Load property, the division went after our financial warranty and a lazge monetary <br />fine. This was not right and you know it. We feel this could happen again. <br />In 1992 we had apre-operation inspection by Wm. York-fern stating in his report the <br />property be documened that the proposed distuubance can be distinguisaged. <br />We need something this time to keep that from happening again. <br />As soon as we receive something from your office we will continue on the conversion <br />application. It must satisfy our attorney. <br />Deanna Van Ella <br />Find files on your PC instantly with the new MSN Toolbaz Suite beta - FREE <br />2127/2005 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.