My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV90490
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV90490
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:12:12 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:03:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
11/18/1999
Doc Name
PRELIMINARY ADEQUACY REVIEW PR-03 NEW HORIZON MINE 2 PN C-81-008
From
DMG
To
WESTERN FUELS-COLORADO
Type & Sequence
PR5
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />3. Projected characteristics of spoil springs. The Division believes a spoil spring at New Horizon Mine would <br />have the following characteristics, based on the preliminary analysis shown on attached Figure I. <br />a) When discharge will begin - 30 years after the installation of the pipe that the permittee plans to <br />install for carrying West Lateral ditch water. The 30- year period is the assumed end of the useful <br />life of the pipe; <br />b) Discharge volume - 226 gpm: <br />c) Concentration of total dissolved solids (TDS) of discharge- 4,000 mg/I; <br />d) Duration of discharge -More than 1.000 years; <br />e) Increase in TDS concentration of San Miguel River caused by spoil spring - (Division has not yet <br />calculated). <br />Please provide the Division your projection of each characteristic "a" through "f' of any spoil springs that <br />may form at the New Horizon Mine, and please document the analysis on which each projection is based. <br />Once the Division verifies your projection, then the probable hydrologic consequences section of the permit <br />can be updated to reflect the projection. <br />(CDMG's analysis in Figure I assumes flow in [he West Lateral ditch is in an unlined open channel, rather <br />than a pipe. The HDPE pipe described in the PR-OS application is assumed to have an expected life of 30 <br />years if it is protected from ultraviolet light degradation. Replacement of the pipe at the end of its useful life <br />would depend on the economics confronting the ditch owner. The ditch owner has not previously installed a <br />pipe at [he mine location; therefore, it is assumed [he owner would not replace the pipe.) <br />4. Useful life of HDPE pipeline. What is the expected useful life of the pipeline, as installed, that is planned for <br />catriing the flow of West Lateral ditch water across [he permit area? <br />5. Impacts on West Lateral irrigation ditch. Prior to mining, seepage from the unlined channel of the ditch <br />has been restricted by the underlying, low-permeability bedrock of the Dakota Sandstone. After mining, this <br />restriction will be removed when highly permeable spoil replaces the bedrock a short distance from the ditch <br />(assuming the proposed pipeline installation is not permanent). If the proposed pipeline is not permanent, then <br />please add to the appropriate pan of your submittal a description of the impacts that you expect mining will <br />have on the ditch. Please include a calculation of pre-mining and projected post-.mining seepage losses from <br />the ditch. <br />6. Locations of pit effluent discharges to ground water. Please identify the location(s) where pit effluent will <br />discharge into ground water through the unmined lowwall/highwallnnce the backfilled spoil is resaturated. <br />Duration of spoil spring impacts to ground water, Page 2.05.6(3)(b)(v) - 1 of existing perjnit <br />application. The second paragraph on this page says that "....replaced spoil wilt only have a minimal short <br />term impact on ground water quality." Please revise this statement to reflect a longer duration if the projected <br />impact is longer than a few years, as [he Division believes (see following paragraphs). <br />The USGS projected a time period of "hundreds to thousands of years" fur elevated TDS levels in Williams <br />Fork formation spoil aquifer water at the Seneca II Mine in Routt County (Williams and Clark, 1994, <br />"Hydrology and Geochemistry of a Surface Mine in Northwestern Colorado", USGS Water-Resources <br />Investigations Report 92-4187, 1994, page 60). Williams and Clark's projection may be applicable to the <br />New Horizon Mine as explained in the following paragraphs. <br />Williams and Clark suegest on page 56 of their report that oxidation of pyrite in spoil is the <br />primary reaction that produces increased TDS in reclaimed spoil aquifer water. The sulfur <br />released by pyrite oxidation combines with oxygen to form sulfate in the spoil aquifer water, <br />thus increasing the concentration of total dissolved solids. TDS levels remain high until the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.