My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REV90451
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Revision
>
REV90451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 3:12:10 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:03:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977211
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/1/1994
Doc Name
APPLICATION FOR PERMIT AMENDMENT AM-01 - PIKEVIEW QUARRY PNM-77-210
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mining Plan <br />• slope gradient, especially when benching is done, is of great concern when far greater changes <br />in slope gradients have never produced stability problems elsewhere. <br />Limestone Bedding Planes - Probably of more concern than average slope gradient <br />is the cross cutting of bedding planes that occurs when mining this formation. The dip of the <br />limestone is about 3:1 to the east, but the mining produces average gradients of about 1.5:1, and <br />sometimes steeper. <br />Furthermore, vertical walls created in the limestone cut across the bedding planes in the <br />opposite direction from the steps. In effect, the method of mining takes a continuous bedding <br />plane and chops it into small pieces, some of which are unsupported. This is the primary cause <br />of bench decay previously discussed. This transformation occurs because the small, unsupported <br />pieces tend to become separated from the underlying material and subsequently slide down to the <br />surface of the next bench. This is apparently caused by rapid weathering. Figure MP-5 <br />diagrammatically explains this process. <br />This fragmentation of the bedding structure is actually advantageous th that it removes <br />the possibility of major collapses. If collapse occurs, it is only small pieces that fall rather than <br />• huge pieces as occurred when the clay slip zone was present. In effect, the fracturing of the <br />bedding plane replaces large scale instability with very small scale instability that is far more <br />easily managed. <br />Dimensions of Hole Opening - As the Hole is created bacld'illing will occur <br />behind the mining and into portions of the Hole that are completed (see Reclamation Plan, <br />Exhibit E). This will be done for several reasons. <br />First, the amount of waste stored on site for use in backfilling must be limited. Room <br />available for waste storage is limited and therefore prompt backfilling must be done to avoid <br />creating "mountains" of waste. <br />Second, backfilling with waste will be needed to establish access roads in and out of the <br />Hole. Thus, the need to easily remove the mined rock requires that backfilling be done and this <br />will help limit the dimensions of the Hole that will be open at any one time. <br />Third, it is not expected that any more than 1/4 of the total length of the west wall of the <br />Hole will be unsupported by backfill (or unmined rock) at any one time. Thus, any large scale <br />instability that might occur would be limited in scope simply because most of the west wall will <br />either be supported by backfill or by native rock yet to be mined. <br />• And fourth, to further support the wall, the backfill will be replaced at an angle across <br />the Hole. Angled backfilling behind the mining will proceed as the Hole is excavated to the <br />Pikeview Quarry Amendment Exhibit D Page 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.