REV90430 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Section 2.03.5, Compliance Information 3. Please update Section 2.03.5, Compliance Information, if applicable. The Division has no further concerns. No updates to this information are necessary. However, page 2.03-1OR was revised in the submittal dated May 8, 2003 to show that this issue was examined in the RN-04 process. Page 2.03-11R was also revised and intentionally left blank. Section 2.03.10, Identification of Oiher Licenses and Permits 4. If applicable, please update the list ofother licenses and permits in Section 2.03.10. TCC has applied for a renewal of their NPDES permit and for renewals of three APEN permits. The process is still ongoing. TCC will submit the updated permits to the Division when the permits are renewed. Section 2.03.11, Identification of Location of Public Office for Filine of Application 5. Please revise page 2.03-13 of Volume I of the permit application to state that revisions and renewals will be filed at the Paonia Public Library. The Division has no further concerns. TCC prefers to keep the Delta County Courthouse as the official public office for filing. The Paonia Public Library will be used as an alternate location for filing, as a courtesy to local residents. Section 2.05.3, Operation Plan- Permit Area 6. Please update Map 5, Facilities, to show that, south of the loadout, certain structures have been demolished and that there are additional railroad tracks. The Division has no further concerns. Map 5 was revised in the submittal dated May 8, 2003. Section 2.05.4. Reclamation Plan The Division reviewed the reclamation cost estimate for the Terror Creek Loadout. The Division's original estimate amounted to $332,284.00. In a submittal dated April 23, 2003, TCC offered several suggestions on revising the bond liability amount. The following is a summary of those issues: a. Material weights were changed from 50% rock/50% dirt to 25% rock/75% dirt for tasks 002 and 010. b. The fuel tank sizes were changed in task 15b. c. The permit does, in fact, only require the removal of the 1,650 feet of side track. Task 15b was changed to reflect this. d. Based on the volumetrics and a site visit, there did appear to be enough room in the cut slope