Laserfiche WebLink
• III. Requested Editorial Chances <br />a. page 4, paragraph 4, 2nd sentence - rewrite to <br />read "Because of the many unresolved issues remaining from the <br />originally groposed mining and reclamation plan..." <br />b. page 10, 2nd line from the top - substitute the <br />word "west" for "east" so that the phrase now reads <br />...previously proposed load-out site west of Riverbend <br />subdivision,..." <br />c. page 10, paragraph 1 under VII, 2nd sentence - <br />delete the phrase "which owns a portion of the coal to be mined." <br />d. page 13, paragraph 4, 3rd sentence - rewrite to <br />read While this refuse pile is desianed to be placed on a V- <br />shaped low permeability pad with a sumo collection system, it <br />will be located over unconsolidated colluvial material, and there <br />is some potential for leaching..." <br />e. page 17, Table 3 - substitute "NCEC Coal Ridge No. <br />1 Mine" for "Storm Ring Mines." <br />f. page 20, paragraph 2, 2nd sentence - rewrite to <br />read ^...consume 300 acre feet." <br />• g. page 2~4, sentence under Section XVI - rewrite to <br />read "The applicant states that no further surface blasting is to <br />take place at the site." <br />h. page 25, paragraph 1, 4th sentence - rewrite to <br />read "The Mine Safety and Health Administration (MHSA) has <br />indicated that they do not consider the backstowing plan to be <br />approvable in the form as originally presented to them. <br />i. page 27, paragraph 1 under Section XXII, 1st <br />sentence - rewrite to read "The applicant has performed an <br />investigation to identify renewable resource lands which could be <br />impacted by subsidence." <br />• 5 <br />