My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-08-10_REVISION - M2001107 (4)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2001107
>
2007-08-10_REVISION - M2001107 (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:58:14 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 10:55:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2001107
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
8/10/2007
Doc Name
Slope Stability Report
From
NCCI
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Table 3 - PseudoStatic Condition Slope Stability Analysis Results <br /> <br /> <br />Descri lion <br />Calculated Factor <br />Of Safe Required <br />Minimum Factor <br />Of Safe <br />Case A 1.12 1.00 <br />Case B 1.11 1.00 <br />Case C 1.11 1.00 <br />Case D 1.06 1.00 <br />Case E 1.10 1.00 <br />Case F 1.12 1.00 <br />Case G 1.10 1.00 <br />Case H 1.09 1.00 <br />VII -CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Case A -The resulting safety factor of 1.28 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.12 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />55 feet from the proposed irrigation pipeline, 75 feet from the WCR 25 right-of--way, and 105 feet <br />from the property line is satisfactory. <br />Case B -The resulting safety factor of 1.27 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of i.11 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />55 feet from the proposed irrigation pipeline and 120 feet from the property line is satisfactory. <br />Case C -The resulting safety factor of 1.28 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.11 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />55 feet from the proposed gas pipeline and 100 feet from the property line is satisfactory. <br />Case D -The resulting safety factor of 1.25 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.06 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />55 feet from the transmission line is satisfactory. <br />Case E -The resulting safety factor of 1.26 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.10 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />55 feet from the west bank of the ditch and 85 feet from the property line is satisfactory. <br />Case F -The resulting safety factor of 1.30 meets the SEO minimum requirement of 1.25 for an <br />embankment during construction. The resulting safety factor of 1.12 is above the SEO minimum <br />requirement of 1.0 for an embankment subject to earthquake loading. The proposed setback of <br />55 feet from the existing gas pipeline is satisfactory. <br />Rankin Property Gravel Pit Expansion Project <br />Slope SlabilityAnalysis <br />Page 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.